Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #64330
From: Chris Zavatston <chris_zavatson@yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Thermal influence on Hydraulic Pressure
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:07:33 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
And just for clarification....
My comment regarding VEP switches was specific to the hydraulic pressure switches.  I forgot that the pitot pressure switch was also made by VEP.  The hydraulic switch replacements are something around $70.

Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360std 1,400 hrs


On Jan 30, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Charles Brown <browncc1@verizon.net> wrote:

Just went through that problem on my Legacy; VEP switch prevented retraction; checked out perfectly on the ground, regularly malfunctioned if flight.  I polled the LML and got several great inputs; selected the TCW ASW-1, available for $45 from Aircraft Spruce (vs $380 quote from Lancair for the VEP).  It's much smaller, lighter, easy to calibrate, and so far, is working perfectly.


On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Gary Edwards wrote:

Rob,
 
Most likely the original VEP switches will be internally corroided and not usuable if they have never been put into service.  I went thru that situation years ago (1990's) during the extended build time.  It cost a fortune to have the VEP company even just test them them, more than a new set from Lancair would cost for the new style.  And the new style is install and fly, whereas the VEP's require adjustments during new flight hours, a big inconvenience.
 
Gary Edwards
LNC2 
 
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 5:28 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Thermal influence on Hydraulic Pressure

Rob,
Lancair carries a new type that is much more reliable.  I forget the brand name.
 
Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360std 1,400 hrs

 
From: Stevens Family <stevens5@swiftdsl.com.au>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 6:40 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Thermal influence on Hydraulic Pressure

Chris,
 
I am interested in your comment about the “Old VEP pressure switches”. The 360 kit I am building comes with those pressure switches. What do you recommend we should use in place of them?
 
Thanks again.
 
Rob Stevens
Perth,
Western Australia.
 
 
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Chris Zavatson
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January 2013 11:56 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Thermal influence on Hydraulic Pressure
 
Scott,
Yep, the failure modes are completely unrelated to each other.
There is a second failure-to-retract mode.  In fact, it is the only one I experienced in my plane.  It was with the old VEP pressure switches.  They would stick open on occassion.  Then the problem is not too much pressure, it is not having any. 
Failure to retract can be a bit more serious if in IMC or taking off at high density altitude.
 
The failure to extend can be fixed by simply raising the operating pressure of the low side circuit.
I have looked at pumps spanning the 95 to 2011 manufacturing time frame.  The only one that would lock up on the ground had spool return springs.  Since the 70g rattle-your-spool controversy appeared, I have also been measuring the spool resistance in every pump I get my hands on.  -haven't found an outliers yet, but I will keep looking.
 
Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360std 1,400hrs
 
From: "Sky2high@aol.com" <Sky2high@aol.com>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:27 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Thermal influence on Hydraulic Pressure
 
Chris,
 
While waiting for Wolfgang's answer, some 200/300 series pilots are becoming concerned that they can't get the gear down when needed.  First, Lorn's secondary problem is that he didn't look for the "gear down and locked" lights before landing.  While the gear down pressure switch saw enough pressure to not allow the pump to start, the failure to recognize that the gear was not down contributed to the belly in landing.
 
To allow people to be more comfortable about the hydro-electric system they should be reminded of this
 
1. The failure to RETRACT the gear because of high pressure on both sides is a problem because of the safe design.  Opening the dump valve doesn't resolve the problem because the system is in a static state with the gear down and locked.  There are no physical forces able to change the system condition - no G-maneuvers, no slips or skids, nada.
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster