Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #45092
From: kneaded pleasures <kneadedpleasures@sbcglobal.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Removing ram air duct from 360 cowling
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:28:44 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Unless persuaded otherwise by commentary from this august body, I intend to remove the ram air duct from my 360 cowling for these reasons:
 
     *Never use ram air;  *It doesn't work (doesn't add inches of air pressure);  * It is draggy (perhaps add a knot of speed by removing);  *Making a tight seal of cowling to ram air aluminum structure has always, for me, been problematic causing some loss of ram air pressure and adversely affecting cooling air;  *Saves weight and complexity (remove one long cable and and air valve and replace with simplified, gently-sweeping 90-degree elbow into fuel injection from air-box/filter);  *Doing previous step permits further streamlining of cowling;  *Plane is now in a repaint cycle so this is logical time to modify cowling;  *Aircraft will hereafter use only clean filtered air;  *Facilitates removal and installation of cowling (less time on my back; less dirt and fewer expletives);  *Most spam can planes have only a single source of filtered air (...I think);  *Air filter will be parallel to airflow entering the plenum  making it very highly unlikely that the air-box can ever be plugged so as to suffocate the engine.  Oh, yes, did I say that I never (except for test) use the ram air feature in flight?
 
My loins are girded.  What thinkest you of this plan?   Greg Nelson
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster