Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #20514
From: Bill Dube <bdube@al.noaa.gov>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel return to tank
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:49:19 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Essentially the same height of fuel. Thus, essentially the same back pressure. Two feet of fuel would be less than 1 psi, regardless.

         Traditionally, you dump the return at the top of the tank. You can see (and sometimes hear) the return working. It helps mix up the fuel. It also makes it is easier to work on the return line. A leak in the return line while the vehicle is parked is less of a catastrophe.

        I can't think of any advantage of plumbing it to the bottom of the tank. I suppose when the tank is near empty the back pressure would be less for the bottom return, but the difference would be a fraction of a psi. Not enough to notice.


At 12:19 PM 4/19/2005, you wrote:
Rusty, I believe returning to the bottom will create slight back pressure on the pump and the possibilities of fuel siphoning out if there is a leak in the system?
Buly

 
I thought about that Buly, but since his tank is 2 foot tall, raising the fuel all the way to the top to return it will add some backpressure too.   As for leaks, just depends on where it is.  Since most of the fuel system is sitting in his lap, I'm guessing he'll catch most leaks right away :-0



Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster