Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #64204
From: Rob Murawski <rob@robmurawski.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: safety
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:52:14 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

FYI, when I talked to EAA insurance (broker) before buying my 360 kit to see if I could afford the insurance on it, I was told that an instrument rating was required to get insurance.  I’m still building, so I can’t comment if that is true, but I do have my instrument ticket so I’m not worried.

 

I know that getting my instrument ticket made me a much better pilot, so I can understand the requirement.  He did make a quip about Legacy owners calling and finding out they were too low time and couldn’t get insured, so he was happy I was calling BEFORE buying/building.

 

-Rob

Lancair 360 MkII, 15% complete.

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Charles Brown
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 1:30 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: safety

 

Ed, I would agree wholeheartedly for any of the turbine powered machines and any Lancair IV -- they are not for joyriding.  At the other end, you wouldn't want to force a 235/320/360 pilot to an IFR rating; they might be in it for low-cost fun.  I guess Legacies and ES are somewhere in the middle.  I wonder if it makes sense to draft a LML or LOBO recommended list of pilot qualifications by airframe/engine combination.  This could be a tool for the insurance industry, whose help I would rather enlist than have the FAA intervene with regulations.  

 

Charley

 

On Jan 27, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Ed Gray wrote:



I believe we should exert MAXIMUM pressure on fellow Lancair pilots to get IFR ratings.  These birds are not suited for amateur pilots, and the stats show it.  

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster