Posted for Joe Bartels, n427jb@bellsouth.net:
I have
stood by after reading most, if not all, of the listings on the Vne issue. The fact is that with every aircraft that either Lance or I
developed, studies were conducted to determine what the Vne should be. These engineering efforts are based on a series of
calculations, ground vibration tests and other information, including actual flying tests to confirm that the published Vne is a reasonable
and safe number. Composite aircraft are generally designed to a higher standard than aluminum aircraft based on "environmental"
issues that cannot be fully determined, thus, these composite aircraft are "stronger" than aluminum aircraft when stressed to the same
levels. That does not mean that all composite aircraft are stronger than aluminum, it just means that when the environmental factor
is added, the composite aircraft will not be weaker than a similarly designed aluminum aircraft. This means that the Vne should
never be disregarded whether in an aluminum or composite aircraft. There is nothing that Lancair can do to stop pilots of
aircraft built from its kits from flying beyond Vne. Under the right circumstances (higher than normal gust loading, inadvertent
flight into thunderstorms, incorrectly flown flight maneuvers, etc.) nature will resolve the issue and certainly that pilot will not fly
beyond Vne again. I am not making light of this subject. In 2008, Lancair was brought to the forefront
of the FAA's attention by the rather extraordinary number of accidents it experienced. Certain individuals at the FAA thought a letter
should be sent out explaining that aircraft with high wing loadings should have equipment such as AOA indicators, stall warning indicators,
etc. That letter was rescinded because I, along with a number of FAA personnel were working together on a final draft that had not
be agreed upon. Whether another letter will come forth or not is unknown. Truly, Lancair does encourage the use of AOA
indicators and/or stall warning indicators, but not as an alternative to extensive and repetitive training. The
various participants in this "spirited debate" have offered their opinions and each should be accepted for what it offers, however, it is
Lancair's considered opinion that flight above Vne is a trip into the unknown. While under perfect conditions it may be successful, but
under others, such as the two in flight break-ups that have been discussed herein, they were not. It is not just speed......it is speed
and loading that causes the tragedy that befalls the families of those left behind and the added expense to Lancair in having to defend
frivolous law suits that normally follow. Congratulations to Jeff Edwards on his first flight of Shelby's new Evolution
:) Happy Holidays to each and every one of you and may we all participate in a full and happy new
year! Joe
|