Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #40533
From: Paul Lipps <elippse@sbcglobal.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: "Ground plane"
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:32:03 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Of course, Silver! 'Can't think of why I wrote Gold! 'Guess I was thinking in terms of IR reflectivity! Our brass x-band waveguide was coated with silver for conductivity, except for some that was made from OFHC (oxygen-free, high-conductivity) copper.
Most talk of signal reception is of a subjective manner; how strong, how far, how clear. The only really good means for determining the merits of an antenna installation is to compare its performance to a standard dipole, or to do a relative comparison of various installations on a given airplane. To do this requires a receiver that has available an output calibrated in terms of signal strength in dBm, deci-Bels(relative to a)milliWatt. Often this is derived from the AGC (automatic gain control) of the receiver. Radio people often use signal strength in micro-Volts, but their systems are usually 75 ohms, and so a conversion must be done to find the equivalence for our 50 ohm systems. That's why dBm, power, is a much better scale; it's independent of system impedance. Why subjective measurements are useless is that unless you know the front-end noise figure of the receiver, or the transmitted power it's receiving, there can be lots of error! Does the reciver use a low-noise, 1.5dB NF pre-amp, or a 6dB NF crystal mixer front end. That 4.5 dB better preamp is worth 68% more range for the same S/N than the mixer front-end. Was the transmitter 4W or 8W; that's another 41%, for a total of 137% more range! How about the coax loss which adds to the front end noise? Was it high loss RG 58, medium loss RG 400, or low loss FSJ1-50.
Here's something an enterprising individual might consider: replace the LE of the Hstab with fiberglass and insert a VOR or GS dipole in it, or do the same with the Vstab LE and put your Comm dipole there. Dipoles are much, much better in radiation toward the horizon than are monopoles with their miniscule "ground-planes", miniscule, that is, relative to several wavelengths.
Attached is a drawing of the antennas I just incorporated in two wingtips I designed. One is for glide-slope, the other is for VOR and localizer.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster