Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #28370
From: John Barrett <2thman@cablespeed.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Lycoming's Future?
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:11:10 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

Let's don't forget the litigating attorneys with limited knowledge or understanding orchestrating this symphony to its crescendo'd conclusion (Movement #1 anyway) Remaining parts to be continued in the form of appeals. --- more money for the liti-gators (not to be confused with their reptilian first cousins residing in the FL swamplands.).
 
Having said that, I have to agree that Lycoming had something like this coming for a long, long time.  It's continental's turn next.
 
Regards,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Hamid A. Wasti
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 2:19 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Lycoming's Future?

Sky2high@aol.com wrote:

"The jurors found the combination of poor design and Vanadium pushed these crankshafts beyond their limits," says Hal Walker.

So 12 people, chosen specifically for their LACK of technical knowledge, get to decide this extremely technical question of material science, metallurgy and mechanical design.  

Hamid

--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster