Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:11:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman@cablespeed.com> Received: from [216.15.205.68] (HELO admin.cablespeed.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 750795 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:08:29 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.15.205.68; envelope-from=2thman@cablespeed.com Received: from [66.235.29.160] (account 2thman@cablespeed.com HELO JohnHome) by admin.cablespeed.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 106446757 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:07:43 -0600 From: "John Barrett" <2thman@cablespeed.com> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Lycoming's Future? X-Original-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:08:40 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01F6_01C5169D.46E29C60" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2742.200 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01F6_01C5169D.46E29C60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Let's don't forget the litigating attorneys with limited knowledge or = understanding orchestrating this symphony to its crescendo'd conclusion = (Movement #1 anyway) Remaining parts to be continued in the form of = appeals. --- more money for the liti-gators (not to be confused with = their reptilian first cousins residing in the FL swamplands.). Having said that, I have to agree that Lycoming had something like this = coming for a long, long time. It's continental's turn next. Regards, John -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of = Hamid A. Wasti Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 2:19 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Lycoming's Future? Sky2high@aol.com wrote: "The jurors found the combination of poor design and Vanadium pushed = these crankshafts beyond their limits," says Hal Walker.=20 So 12 people, chosen specifically for their LACK of technical = knowledge, get to decide this extremely technical question of material = science, metallurgy and mechanical design. =20 Hamid -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/ ------=_NextPart_000_01F6_01C5169D.46E29C60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Let's don't forget the litigating = attorneys=20 with limited knowledge or understanding orchestrating this symphony to = its=20 crescendo'd conclusion (Movement #1 anyway) Remaining parts to be = continued in=20 the form of appeals. --- more money for the liti-gators (not to be = confused with=20 their reptilian first cousins residing in the FL = swamplands.).
 
Having said that, I have to agree = that=20 Lycoming had something like this coming for a long, long time.  = It's=20 continental's turn next.
 
Regards,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing = List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Hamid A.=20 Wasti
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 2:19 = PM
To:=20 Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Lycoming's=20 Future?

Sky2high@aol.com wrote:

"The jurors found=20 the combination of poor design and Vanadium pushed these crankshafts = beyond=20 their limits," says Hal Walker.

So 12 = people,=20 chosen specifically for their LACK of technical knowledge, get to = decide this=20 extremely technical question of material science, metallurgy and = mechanical=20 design.  

Hamid

--

For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
= ------=_NextPart_000_01F6_01C5169D.46E29C60--