Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #14733
From: <JOSCALES@aol.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Short Tail Numbers
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:36:40 -0400
To: <lml>
I have a "short" tail number on my Lancair ES----N98AF.  I have never had a controller ask for my "full call sign".  I believe that is the case because I always check in with new controllers, whether ground, tower, departure, center or anyone else the way my flight instructor taught me.  Simply, I was taught to always identify myself to new controllers with my aircraft name and full tail number.  When I was flying Cessna 172's the initial contact was always "Cessna 737GC" or "Cessna 4752N" or if flying a Piper Archer it was "Archer 3646F".  Subsequent contacts required only the last three digits (7GC, 52N or 46F).

I was occasionally asked what model of Cessna or Piper it was but there never seemed to be any question about my tail number.

When flying my Lancair I always check on with "Lancair 98AF".   For the rest of the contacts with that controller  I use "8AF" and so does the controller. When I get handed off I start over with full identification.  Simple and works for me. I like the short tail number that I have.  I believe it identifies the plane as being a little different and possibly special.  I think that is nice and good thing for homebuilders.

I would agree with the person who posted that there are certain letters to avoid.  I tried several combinations in practice and tried to picture myself saying those words thousands of times.  I definitely passed on several attractive sets that were just too hard to say.  But that is just me.

Thought I would add my viewpoint.  I believe the circle is now complete.

Jim Scales
98AF Lancair Super ES
"Angel's Playmate"
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster