Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #7103
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary engine
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:07:11 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
<... The standard Velocity can actually use a 160 hp which is a standard non ported 13b (or a Lyc 320) and still push it along at about 167 kts ... well according to the sales literature <g>) ....>
Make that a <G>.  I have a standard Velocity with a Lyc LIO-360 at 205 hp (allegedly) and I can make about 140 - 145 kts.  Maybe 150 or 155 so with wheel pants.  Mine is not an ideal or optimized Velocity, and there's a lot of weight in the front seat which is important on canards, but I would regard 200 honest hp a good place to start.
I would go with a Renesis.  O-540 power right out the gate, and always the option of turbo.  Who was it said brand new renesis costs like used rebuilt 20B?
That would be my choice .... Jim S.

CBarber wrote:

Wahoo, another Velocity Builder.  I am building a standard (with the standard wing).  I am using a two rotor, just not sure if standard 13b with standard porting (for approx 200 hp) or a Renesis.  The standard Velocity can actually use a 160 hp which is a standard non ported 13b (or a Lyc 320) and still push it along at about 167 kts.....well according to the sales literature <g>).I was seriously thinking the three rotor 20b when I first started my research, but decided against the extra weight, scarcity, cost and complexity.  I have been constantly told the 13b should be able to be ported to 190 to 200 hp without any real issue. Even though the turbo will add some complexity it should give you the power you want.John Slade is using a 13b turbo in his Cozy and should be flying any day now....Right John? He as a great website (with a lousy URL that I can't remember) but you can link there from my builders site under the engine page)Please keep me/us posted as I am very interested in what you decide and how you do it.All the best,Chriswww.LoneStarVelocity.com 
 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Christopher Barber

Attorney and Counselor at Law

"Serving the needs of Senior Texans"

Barber Law Firm
11930 S Sam Houston Pkwy E
Suite 103
Houston, Texas 77089-4755
281-464-LAWS (5297)
 

CBarber@TexasAttorney.net
www.TexasAttorney.net
 

 

Texas

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Rino Lacombe
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 7:38 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary engine
 
I am still on the fence, but would like to decide what engine to use.  I am building a Large wing Velocity, not the XL.  One of the original designers of that version of the plane recommends that an  io-540 250 horse would be the ideal engine.  Now I was thinking of either a 2 rotor that would be turboed to 200+ hp at sl not at 10K or a NA 3 rotor.
 I would like to get a consensus of the better way to go?  Suggestions?  If I have to, I could probably hang the exhaust out the cowl, or modify the cowl so as to get some airflow over the exhaust to help cool it. Bob I would go for the Renesis, the RX8 engine if I was starting today.It is much lighter for the same or better HP than a 13b with turbo like I presently have. Rino 

--
Jim Sower ... Destiny's Plaything
Crossville, TN; Chapter 5
Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T
 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster