Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #30877
From: Hennie van Rooyen [HQP] <Hennie.vanRooyen@kumbaresources.com>
Subject: RE: Rotary installed weight comparison
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:38:47 +0200
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Thanks guys. I do read everything over at Paul Lamar's group, the Osprey group and also over here on a regular basis. But I've read of 160# to in the mid 300# 13B's.( and even the mentioned 190# which started this thread) I'm hoping to use a 13B in my amphib and would like to keep everything as simple and as light as possible, hence my question.
 
I know about Ken's Coot, but his is heavy. (Yes, I know he uses nitro to boost his power to 300hp for water take-offs which sounds like a neat solution! And I believe he's done this often with no ill results) However, I'm trying to keep my project as light as possible to keep water operating speeds as low as possible.
 
One last question: Would a belt PSRU be much lighter than the geared ones mostly used? Also, is it REALLY neccessary to use two bearing on both pulleys as I've seen a 13B installatioin which used only one on each end.
 
Regards,
Hennie 
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael McGee [mailto:jmpcrftr@teleport.com]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:40 AM
Subject: Rotary installed weight comparison

..(this was the thread about the [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary - FWD from Lancair ES List )..

Here's info for a rotary installation comparison if Tracy can recall his last W&B on his RV-4.  Tracy, how does your plane compare to this?
  • My RV-4 is bone stock VFR with lights (think J3-with-a-speed-kit) first flown in '96.
  • Lyc O-320 E2G, 150 HP, 2 mags, carb, no vacuum system, one radio and transponder
  • Sensenich FP metal prop with 2 2" spacers (41 pounds total for prop & spacers)
  • That big stock boat anchor starter
  • Heavier than necessary 10 ply tires (extra 6#) because they were on sale.
Empty weight 979# with 48# on the tail wheel
Empty CG 69.25 inches (using the 60 inch datum)


Mike McGee, RV-4 N996RV, O320-E2G, Hillsboro, OR
13B in gestation mode, RD-1C, EC-2



At 09:00 2006-03-23, you wrote:
It varies a lot depending on builder choices but I would put it closer to an O - 320,  a 30 - 45 lb difference depending on which of the many versions of the IO - 360 that Lycoming made).  The counterweighted crankshaft on the angle valve IO-360  (200 HP models) accounts for a 28 pound increase alone.
 
Tracy

Hennie,
I’m told the 2-rotor will come in about the same as an IO-360 installation.  This is a very common install in the RV-6, also in the RV-4 (Tracy Crook).  If you’re really interested, you can get onto the Fly Rotary group.  Good bunch of guys and they will be able to answer any question you may have about the rotary.

 
Mark   


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [ mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Hennie van Rooyen [HQP]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 5:56 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary - FWD from Lancair ES List

 
Hi Mark and anyone,

 
" Mazdatrix recently dyno’d a N/A peripheral-ported 13B for Paul Lamar at 250hp @ 6000rpm, running a carburetor.  That is an easy 125hp/rotor, and 250 hp from a 195# engine."

 
What would be a reasonable firewall forward weight of such a N/A complete installation? What I really want to know is what is the lightest installation to be expected based on average experience?

 
Regards,

 
Hennie
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail is confidential and is for the addressee only.
Please refer to http://www.kumbaresources.com/email-disclaimer for important disclaimers.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster