Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #28530
From: Monty Roberts <montyr2157@alltel.net>
Subject: Exhaust tuning
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:57:49 -0600
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Well,
 
I have nothing better to do on a Saturday night so I will subject you all collectively to my random thoughts (assuming you read this)
 
I have been trying figure out how to cram a muffled, tuned, road-race, exhaust system under my (tight) cowl. No easy task.
 
I am going to be running a Pport NA high compression motor.
 
The prevailing wisdom is to use 10-26 inch primary pipe into a collector to a 24 in megaphone that goes from around 2 in to 4 in dia. over it's length.
 
After looking at this thing for so long my head hurts I have concluded that the rotary shares aspects of a two cycle and four cycle but is nothing like either in terms of exhaust system tuning.
 
Two cycle recips can use a divergent/convergent cone type expansion chamber. The timing of the pulses alternately draws gases out of the combustion chamber to assist scavenging to the point of overscavenging at the operating point, and then "stuffs" the overscavenged mixture back in at the last moment as the port closes to effectively supercharge the engine.
 
The rotary is similar except for the fact that the port is never "closed" so the convergent reflective wave will never arrive at the right time. It will either impede flow from the exhausting chamber or it will "stuff" exhaust back into the intake side. The combination of overlap and the fact that the port is open to two different chambers when you could use a positive pressure wave, makes it impossible to use typical two stroke tuning techniques.
 
Likewise it is impossible to use "interference working" as is typical on a four cycle recip engine. This uses one branch of the header as an organ pipe resonator when the other exhaust valve is closed. You can only design a system for a rotary that operates on the "independence working" principle.
 
The literature (I have a graph from the pope's newsletter that he bogarted from a Mazda technical paper and "copyrighted") and racing practice shows a primary length of around 31in  to give the best results in the 5-6Krpm range. That is a long pipe to fit under a cowl. These results were obtained with a single rotor engine. From the previous discussion it should be evident that positive reflections cannot be used with the rotary. Only negative or suction waves will help. With a two rotor feeding into a collector and then into a divergent cone, the effective tuned primary length is half of the single rotor. This is somewhere around 15.5 inches. The cone should then be another 15.5 inches long. Each rotor now sees the 31 inch tuned length plus an extra suction wave from the other rotor. This of course assumes no positive pressure waves go back up the collector (use as shallow an angle as possible). Alternately the cone could be 24 inches long (available from racing beat) and the header primaries could be 7 inches long. I don't suppose anybody has ever tried anti reversion headers?
 
The muffler is a another issue, better quit while I'm ahead (I think)
 
Monty
 
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster