Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #23197
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 problems - solved / rotary risks
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:06:43 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
I like to see some expertise put into adding backup ignition & fuel delivery systems. Could a carburetor with its own fuel feed double as a throttle body, and could a magneto be used to run the ignition?
John 
 
Funny, but I've been thinking the same thing about the carb.  It just seems like a natural way to have a backup fuel device, though transitioning from one to the other on the fly for testing could be entertaining :-)  The only thing you'd have to add is a low pressure fuel pump for the carb.  You could even look at this as something to use in the event of an alternator failure, since it would draw less current than the EFI system.  
 
As for ignition, I haven't worked that part out yet.  The temptation would be to try to have two high tension wires connected to the leading plugs, but what effect that would have on the system that wasn't on would be the question.  I haven't looked into it that closely.  
 
I actually told someone this morning about the long time dream of having a centerline thrust twin, where each engine would actually have enough power to fly the plane.  The original idea was for two Rotax engines,  because at the time, they were cheap, light, and reliability wouldn't be so much of an issue.  Now, the dream centers around two single rotor engines, but you'd need the aluminum housings to make it worthwhile for weight.  This would be the ultimate in redundancy, and you wouldn't worry about putting two of everything on each engine.  Most of these engine computers, and EFI pumps, etc are so reliable as to almost make it a waste to have a spare.    
 
Cheers,
Rusty (dream over, back to reality)   
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster