|
Jerry, the Ford injectors are not directly compatible. Here are the details:
ENGINE SIDE FUEL RAIL SIDE Ford 0.55" 0.55 Mazda 0.65 (with the FAT Mazda rubber ring) 0.435
Note that the electrical connector is the same (center spline top/inside and center lower outside). So, the Ford injector will hook up electrically but the fuel connectors must be different. Ken Powell Bryant, Arkansas 501-847-4721
-------------- Original message --------------
> Ken, are the Ford injectors interchangeable with the stock Mazda > injectors as far as size, plug and so on? If so, do you have a part > number? BTW sorry but there is no way you can run a p port at 7500 > rpm and only get 225 hp. Can you accept 240? Jerry > > > > > > On Tuesday, March 22, 2005, at 03:48 PM, kenpowell@comcast.net wrote: > > > But this graph was for a carburated engine so it really > proves nothing. Besides, the engine only needs to be as rich as we > want to run - you can't hurt the engine by running lean (I know, if > you run it into the trees on a 100 F. day that will HURT it!!!). I > have not seen any graphs showing power improvement beyond 0.6 on a NA > engine and with very little to be gained by going beyond .55. If > anyone can educate me differently please do so (no kidding, I'm trying > to learn). I'm planning on using 42 lb Ford injectors for my P-Port > motor, if this isn't enough I want to know (planning on 225 HP at 7500 > RPM). > > Ken Powell > > Bryant, Arkansas > > 501-847-4721 > > > > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > > v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} > w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape > {behavior:url(#default#VML);} st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } > > Arial0000,0000,8080Rus > ty, > > > Arial0000,0000,8080Are > you sure youíre allowing yourself enough margin on the top end by > using .55 bsfc. This chart (snitched from the other list) indicates > that .55 is about right up to around 7500, but at 8000 rpm bsfc will > be up around .60. What does that do to your hp numbers? > > > > Arial0000,0000,8080 > > smaller> > > > Arial0000,0000,8080Mar > k > S. > > > Arial0000,0000,8080 > > smaller> > > > < > > > > Arial0000,0000,8080 > > smaller> > > > < > >
Times New Roman > > > > From:Rotary motors in > aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf > OfRussell Duffy > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:25 PM > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel injector size, and redrive > losses > > > Times New Roman > > > Times New RomanRC Engineering's calcs show > that you are good to 302 HP at 43 psi fuel pressure, .50 BSFC, and > 100% duty cycle. Of course you can't run the injectors at 100% > (except maybe briefly like a drag race, not applicable to aircraft). > So at 80% duty cycle the 38 lb injectors should be good for 242 HP. > Enjoy your idle!!! Your injectors are big enough unless you P-Port > and turn at least 8000 RPM. > > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000Hi > Ken, > > > Times New Roman > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000RC > Engineering's calc shows the same as the fuel calculator that I > posted the other day. Four 38 lb/hr injectors, at 80% duty cycle, .55 > BSFC, should be good for about 220 HP at the flywheel. I imagine that > will be enough for the current engine, but not by a wide margin. I > plan to run this engine as high as 8000 if I can, though I'll be > amazed if I can get beyond 7500. Don't need no stinkin' P-Port for > these rpms :-) > > > Times New Roman > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000On > the fuel spreadsheet that I posted (stolen) the other day, it gives a > HP figure for the flywheel, and rear wheels. The estimate for > the power loss due to a manual trans and diff is 15% on this > spreadsheet. Anyone know what this amounts to for our redrive, and > prop? > > > Times New Roman > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000Cheers, > or> > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000Rusty > (hoping Ed out types me) > > > Times New Roman > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000 > > fontfamily> > > > <
|