Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #17955
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: E-shaft permanent magnet alternator
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:35:26 -0600
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Your comment below implies that an EWP is *more* reliable than a belt. I don't think that has been shown to be the case yet.
Bill Schertz
 
 
True, but one of the best features of the EWP is the ability to have a backup pump, and most people will be using it that way.  I'd bet that two EWP's are more reliable than two belts. 
 
Rusty (actively ignoring my conference call)  
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster