Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 759092 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:35:41 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.71; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050225163454.JLBW2375.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:34:54 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: E-shaft permanent magnet alternator Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:35:26 -0600 Message-ID: <000b01c51b58$02b5ad60$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C51B25.B81B3D60" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C51B25.B81B3D60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Your comment below implies that an EWP is *more* reliable than a belt. I don't think that has been shown to be the case yet. Bill Schertz True, but one of the best features of the EWP is the ability to have a backup pump, and most people will be using it that way. I'd bet that two EWP's are more reliable than two belts. Rusty (actively ignoring my conference call) ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C51B25.B81B3D60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Your comment below = implies that an=20 EWP is *more* reliable than a belt. I don't think that has been shown to = be the=20 case yet.
Bill Schertz
 
 
True, but one of the best features of the EWP = is the=20 ability to have a backup pump, and most people will be using it that = way. =20 I'd bet that two EWP's are more reliable than two=20 belts. 
 
Rusty (actively ignoring my conference=20 call)  
------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C51B25.B81B3D60--