|
|
|
Group,
I want to remind everyone about how much a priority the large volume
inlets are to us. I believe Ed Anderson was mentioning in one of his posts how
difficult it can be to get a MAP signal in the airbox of one of our PP engines.
This is a perfect indication of why the smaller throttle bodies used on some of
the slow turning engines will kill our HP. In a high turning engine, rotary or
piston, wide open throttle will often result in very low vacuum in the inlet for
considerable time until the engine reaches steady state. On of the reasons
for a tuned intake is to get the air moving and keep it that way until the ports
open. That is how the rotary can achieve better than 100% flow efficiencies. Our
engines are better compared to the motorcycle engines I used to build than a
Lycoming. An example with which I have a lot of personal experience, a Yamaha
FZR 1000 is a perfect for comparison. Engines I built were dynoed at over
160 HP at 10k RPM. This is from 1 liter. This output level isn't even
exceptional as this engine was used for endurance racing. Many make lots more!
Some of the 2-stroke 500cc Grand Prix bikes were producing over 200 HP at the
end of the 2 cycle formula! These engines would not have produced 1/2 that using
1 Eliason. The Yamaha used 4, (count 'em), 4 43mm flat slide downdraft
carbs. The only way to get the power we expect is to process lots of
air. We are also usually trying to keep the airflow at somewhat less than
supersonic velocities which would complicate tuning even
more. Plan to use a good injection system, even if you don't use a full
EMS. Leon's comments are correct however abrasive they may seem. You can buy a
small O2 sensor based tuning aid from lots of sources for less than 80 bucks. Do
your initial tuning on unleaded premium auto gas and you can ground tune with a
good indication of if you are somewhere close before ever even taxi testing.
(which you should do to check dynamic effects before flying) Using a dyno is
even better. Using a paraphrase of an old machinists saying, Test twice, fly
once. (successfully!)
Bill Jepson
|
|