To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 07:41:55 -0600
Subject: Hydraulics threads
Message-ID: <20010221.074201.-476107.0.rcalden@juno.com>
From: Richard C Alden <rcalden@juno.com>
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Mime-Version: 1.0

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
Brent Regan is absolutely right about the propensity of MIL-H-5606 fluid
to absorb air.  His suggestion to put it to a light vacuum is right on,
unless you have a lot of time for the air to out-gas voluntarily.

Re the use of DOT 4 (or DOT *) brake fluid.  Don't do it!  O-rings come
in a pretty wide variety of "rubber" compounds, and a variety of
hardnesses (Shore hardness).  In-service performance (swell, hardness,
etc) is affected by the compound/fluid combination.  Standard hydraulic
design practice (with -5606) uses rings of Buna-N with a specific shore
hadness.  It's been 12 years since I retired from engineering and I can't
call the Spec numbers for the rings from memory.  I'll try to get with a
younger GenDyn (now Lockheed/Martin) engineer this week and post the
numbers.
Dick Alden
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>