Return-Path: Received: from marvkaye.olsusa.com ([205.245.9.212]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with SMTP id AAA25365 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:50:24 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19981012094947.00af0fd4@olsusa.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:49:47 -0400 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: Sven.Jerlhagen@ecs.ericsson.se (by way of Marvin Kaye ) Subject: 320 fuel system reply X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Any automatic system has to be designed such that no single failure will create a catastrophe. Failure of a relay is handled fine by your warning light. But when the lower float switch fails (it will happen eventually) you will not notice. Since you will be used to your fuel system handling itself, the first thing you will notice is when the engine stops. Failure of the circuit breaker or wiring means the same. The system should have two circuit breakers, one for driving pumps and automatics, and one for a completely separate monitoring system. The simplest mod to your system would be to add a cb/fuse, and third float, or drive the relays from the upper float only. If you can't do a safe redundant automatic system (i.e. fails gracefully), I prefer the standard system. SE-XOP Sven