Return-Path: Received: from sam.the-i.net ([206.136.176.251]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:52:02 -0500 Received: from pavilion (ccd232.the-i.net [216.86.8.232]) by sam.the-i.net (Vircom SMTPRS 4.4.184) with SMTP id for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:59:23 -0600 Message-ID: <000701c05019$3cadc700$e80856d8@pavilion> From: "J. N. Cameron" To: "Lancair List" Subject: Wing incidence on ES Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:04:04 -0600 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Okay, okay, I did a machine re-count and then a manual recount, and the wing incidence is closer than I thought, maybe only a tenth or two of a degree off. Still, the point I made in my earlier post is still valid; i.e., the wing incidence is fixed in the FB by the way the shear box is set, and the HStab incidence is easily changed just by sliding it forward or aft in the cradles. Best procedure is to set up the wings first, measure the incidence carefully, and only then set the HStab relative to the wings. Apologies to the guys in Redmond -- the wings are much better this time. Jim Cameron >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>