Return-Path: Received: from imo-d10.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.42]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2000 13:18:11 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-d10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.32.) id k.43.bac84d2 (4242) for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2000 13:25:30 -0400 (EDT) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <43.bac84d2.27232b89@aol.com> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 13:25:29 EDT Subject: Re: MT Prop To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I'm also interested in the answers to Angier's questions regarding which MT propeller to use. I dedided a while ago on an MT over a Hartzell because it looks cool, it's quieter, it looks cool, it's lighter, it looks cool, it may sacrifice itself to save my crankshaft on a prop-strike, and it looks cool. Yes, I know it's more expensive and requires more maintenance. Nobody said all these decisions were totally logical. Did I mention that it looks cool? - Rob Wolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>