X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 07:26:23 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTPS id 7065835 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:04:22 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=dragonnorth@gmail.com Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ik5so2819916vcb.34 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:03:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.122.132 with SMTP id l4mr7213827vcr.41.1407279828260; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:03:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Sender: dragonnorth@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.186.200 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.186.200 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:03:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:03:48 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1MnLjCK0K6N_T0XKiXq3enHlvOY X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LML] Well, that's confusing... From: Michael Newman X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0118263c435cd004ffe9def2 --089e0118263c435cd004ffe9def2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Looking at source materials rather than inflammatory news may be a good idea here. As I understand it the only recent change is that the FAA issued a clarification that final assembly was to be considered an aeronautical use. The intent of this clarification was clearly to favor at least part of homebuilding use. Seeking further favorable clarification might be a better approach. On Aug 5, 2014 6:54 PM, "Mark Sletten" wrote: > > > http://www.aopa.org/News-and-Video/All-News/2014/July/24/faa-drafts-new-hangar-policy > > --Mark > --089e0118263c435cd004ffe9def2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Looking at source materials rather than inflammatory news ma= y be a good idea here. As I understand it the only recent change is that th= e FAA issued a clarification that final assembly was to be considered an ae= ronautical use. The intent of this clarification was clearly to favor at le= ast part of homebuilding use. Seeking further favorable clarification might= be a better approach.

On Aug 5, 2014 6:54 PM, "Mark Sletten"= <mwsletten@gmail.com> wro= te:
--089e0118263c435cd004ffe9def2--