It's about time the FAA is addressing this serious problem.  Imagine,
building an airplane on an airport!

To let everyone know they are serious, I hope they start with the big fish
like Boeing, Cessna, Bombardier, etc.  This way us privateers will get the
clear message.

Better still, let the scofflaws do their builds far from any US airport.
Let's say in China.

An unintended benefit of this new program will be a surplus of unoccupied
hangars that can be torn down to create some more green space.

Where would we be without this government?

Peter Van Arsdale
St. Louis, MO



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 5:00 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: lml Digest #4700

       Lancair Mailing List Digest #4700

1) Re: FAA says hangars no place for homebuilders
   by "Dominic V. Crain" <domcrain@tpg.com.au>
2) FAA says hangars no place for homebuilders
   by "Jim Nordin" <panelmaker@earthlink.net>
3) Re: Gascolators and fuel lines.
   by bob mackey <n103md@yahoo.com>
4) Re: FAA says hangars no place for homebuilders
   by John B <2thman1@gmail.com>
5) Balston Magneto filter
   by "jwilless@itd-nc.com" <jwilless@itd-nc.com>
6) Re: N40941 (LIVP) Filed TAS 295 knots. Was this realistic at 15000'
cruise and 1
   by "John C. Bohn" <johnb@bohn-tech.com>
7) Re: Balston Magneto filter
   by Neal George <ngeorge@continentalmotors.aero>
8) Re: FAA says hangars no place for homebuilders
   by "Ted Noel" <tednoel@cfl.rr.com>
9) Aeronautical use of Hangars
   by rwolf99@aol.com

This digest is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list <lml@lancaironline.net>.
For archives and help click
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/Lists/lml/List.html
LML website: http://www.lancaironline.net/maillist.html