X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:42:04 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-6955685@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <mwsletten@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yh0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e)
  with ESMTPS id 6954768 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:56:05 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.213.45; envelope-from=mwsletten@gmail.com
Received: by mail-yh0-f45.google.com with SMTP id t59so3453881yho.4
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.236.113.129 with SMTP id a1mr35821963yhh.127.1403906130947;
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.170.98.139 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Sletten <mwsletten@gmail.com>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:55:10 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <CAG-Xp-s13D46pxXJy1_WoaAYNPG5BxJbTQ9OZkZUAMr_dOxmVg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Two-blade or three-blade prop for IO-550.
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300e51213bb37404fcd85e03

--20cf300e51213bb37404fcd85e03
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Gang,

I know the Legacy was originally fitted with a two-bladed prop, but most
people seem to be using the three-blade variety these days. Anyone care to
go over the pros and cons?

Thanks,

--Mark

--20cf300e51213bb37404fcd85e03
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr">Gang,<div><br></div><div>I know the Legacy was originally fitted with a two-bladed prop, but most people seem to be using the three-blade variety these days. Anyone care to go over the pros and cons?</div><div>

<br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>--Mark</div></div>

--20cf300e51213bb37404fcd85e03--