Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #70098
From: Bill Harrelson <n5zq@verizon.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] LNC2 W&B
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 14:09:37 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Gil,
 
Very unusual for a LNC2 to be too nose heavy. I’m not familiar with your plane, has it flown yet? If not, I would certainly fly it first. Adding weight at the tail might make the W&B numbers look good but it adds rotational inertia to a plane that can have fairly ugly stall/spin characteristics. Theoretically, one can achieve a particular weight and CG with a lot of weight at either end and less in the middle or more in the middle and less at the extremes. The later would tend to have better spin recovery characteristics. It has been my experience with LNC2s that a full break stall will almost always break hard one way or the other (begin rotation). If correct recovery techniques (rudder) are not applied with alacrity, a spin can easily develop. The more rotational inertia the harder time the rudder has stopping it. I would suggest careful thought and perhaps consulting someone with serious aerodynamic engineering credentials before undertaking this modification.
 
Bill Harrelson
formerly N5ZQ 320 2,200 hrs
now        N6ZQ  IV   550 hrs
 
 
 
My plane is nose heavy. I've heard about builders who put lead into the tail below the vertical stabilizer. Does anyone have experience doing this? And would you mind sharing exactly how to go about adding weight to the tail of the plane.
 
--
 
Gil Cargill
Cargill Consulting Group, Inc.
310.447.4102
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster