X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:36:07 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm30-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([98.139.213.126] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.8) with ESMTPS id 6720150 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:21:55 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.213.126; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=gcom1024; d=yahoo.com; b=hSo2a1V9lDQm1JT+MtBfCluSEdh4Cgj5ZWX5fXOz6S7ndA3aTnNEoVRZx+q8ApSIKGRFxO9Cv+MgdzN9t78hnU4046Mmb2LEBXnKIji6zMh1W0vMd+kg4+t44tbQvJ7HwJPGGSce1ah+KRStZ1FBOcFdZEm9u4qkWvjeKUy/jsM=; Received: from [98.139.212.153] by nm30.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Feb 2014 00:21:19 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.196] by tm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Feb 2014 00:21:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp205.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Feb 2014 00:21:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 630659.76811.bm@smtp205.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: IblsQzUVM1nu7jsB_xsgzH1dHZCnvqpVfb0UwpmWJB0svUW MK4mnh7p2FJS1lxB4yFSRMB4x9_Vu3OGbtUzkqam_p2g7Mz.W_iCx0lZEd_t vFSYhDiwX6WWuHWi0XElL7GreEYTid3kS9jEikCSOVbcLTvuGd6WOe7FgbeN AzmsnrtBdSJGbAUnF1xIIdwo4X7izQC8z9EbqxwNn9yXEbpsnJ67NtV94LRJ rG8MsgJSk.S794kRHEmqDvBn8t9YCsQznvcljxaBSBGsin2E7D2FNO.JmdtO 90vOHH70QhsnarmzAnA4uaiFKC9qzR5nHD2U.ZFp.DJ8tYgmODOlWjoPnxmA HODon.LeSj1jy3ZdptO3._D_0bJoYL1CsHQqA8v1EdEWoL2mycBlkoKNxUOV __fPZivz9heddvJRRIgid5X8hvAiV2J8gGiWJjsDirBgvK.3RBsn_UwCtLKa LQXjtN3QH10Uv7kNSQ4olJhaN6AmluVve4quA8Wr.LZEv5zhsftucc9IT0MN xO6xu6C6pM7_au_jgBl_yWN3lyublxVWf4mEOoYyorC11vKS4S1_f X-Yahoo-SMTP: tg4YEXeswBAq79ZTs5A79J5zDY9lAVNV X-Rocket-Received: from [192.168.1.103] (randylsnarr@76.8.220.20 with xymcookie [98.138.86.130]) by smtp205.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 Feb 2014 16:21:19 -0800 PST References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-24D2A471-C316-4450-8EBA-C0B57884749B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Cc: "lml@lancaironline.net" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11A501) From: Personal Subject: Re: [LML] Lancair 235 info X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 17:21:17 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-24D2A471-C316-4450-8EBA-C0B57884749B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable IMHO, a 2 place Lancair 235 or otherwise is a bad idea on a 2000 ft grass st= rip. I have 900 ish hours on my 235 and have landed on a 2500 ft paved runway onc= e 3000 a few times.=20 You can do it but there is no room for error. Being based on that short of f= ield will eventually catch up to you. Randy Snarr 235/320 N694RS Sent from my iPad > On Jan 26, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Steve wrote: >=20 > David, > I will post your question on the Lancair Mailing List for input from L235 o= wners who may have experience with grass strips. > My opinion is 2000' is too short even for a paved strip and grass would be= too hard on the landing gear. Let's see what the 235 guys have to say. > Steve Colwell >=20 > Sent from my iPhone >=20 >> On Jan 26, 2014, at 5:29 AM, Claudette wrote: >>=20 >> Answer him pls. Can't really operate that small gear on grass can u >>=20 >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >>=20 >> Begin forwarded message: >>=20 >>> From: >>> Date: January 25, 2014 at 10:57:16 AM CST >>> To: c.colwell@lancairowners.com >>> Subject: Lancair info >>> Reply-To: ergo@ipa.net >>>=20 >>> Mr. Colwell, >>>=20 >>> I have very recently considered a Lancair 235. I am in Arkansas and liv= e on a 2000 ft grass airstrip. I don't really know anyone with a lancair ne= ar me. I live near RUE to the north on Landers Loop Private. I have looked o= nline and don't really see much on performance and durability/safety. I wou= ld like to visit with someone that would have legitimate knowledge to give m= e some advice. I appreciate any help you may be able to lend! >>>=20 >>> Thanks, >>> David Wilbanks >>> 479 857-0961. =20 --Apple-Mail-24D2A471-C316-4450-8EBA-C0B57884749B Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
IMHO, a 2 place Lancair 235 or otherwi= se is a bad idea on a 2000 ft grass strip.
I have 900 ish hours on= my 235 and have landed on a 2500 ft paved runway once 3000 a few times.&nbs= p;
You can do it but there is no room for error. Being based on th= at short of field will eventually catch up to you.

= Randy Snarr
235/320
N694RS

Sent from my iP= ad

On Jan 26, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Steve <mcmess1919@yahoo.com> wrote:

David,
I will post your question on the L= ancair Mailing List for input from L235 owners who may have experience with g= rass strips.
My opinion is 2000' is too short even for a paved str= ip and grass would be too hard on the landing gear.  Let's see what the= 235 guys have to say.
Steve Colwell

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 26, 2014, at 5:29 AM, Claudette <colwell.ch@gmail.com> wrote:

Answer him pls.  Can= 't really operate that small gear on grass can u


Sent from= my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: <ergo@ipa.= net>
Date: January 25, 2014 at 10:57:16 AM CST
To: c.colwell@lancairowners.com=
Subject: Lancair info
Reply-To: ergo@ipa.net

Mr. Colwell,

I have= very recently considered a Lancair 235.  I am in Arkansas and live on a= 2000 ft grass airstrip.  I don't really know anyone with a lancair nea= r me. I live near RUE to the north on Landers Loop Private.  I have loo= ked online and don't really see much on performance and durability/safety. &= nbsp;I would like to visit with someone that would have legitimate knowledge= to give me some advice.  I appreciate any help you may be able to lend= !

Thanks,
David Wilbanks
479 857-0961.   
=
= --Apple-Mail-24D2A471-C316-4450-8EBA-C0B57884749B--