X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:46:15 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [63.230.26.161] (HELO exchange.arilabs.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.8) with ESMTPS id 6706736 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:04:22 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=63.230.26.161; envelope-from=kevin@arilabs.net Received: from exchange.arilabs.net ([10.100.100.1]) by exchange.arilabs.net ([10.100.100.1]) with mapi; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:03:44 -0700 From: Kevin Stallard X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:03:24 -0700 Subject: RE: [LML] Re: LOBO eNews -- January 2014 Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: LOBO eNews -- January 2014 Thread-Index: Ac8blZbIb3WoB5e1QRKZC6YwBDXvsQAzmlrG X-Original-Message-ID: <779FE3D761D7B741813E300858A248CFF3BD557453@exchange.arilabs.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I don't know about anyone else, but I don't need an AOA to know that I can'= t do that=85. ________________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Terrence O'= Neill [troneill@charter.net] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 12:24 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: LOBO eNews -- January 2014 Kevin, Yes, I agree. He pulled his wing up into a stall-angle -- because he did n= ot have or did not use an AOA -angle of attack indicator. An AOA indicator PRIMARILY shows a pilot -- instantly, eye-to-hand -- how c= lose he himself is pitching his wing -- to its stall angle. Speed has nothing to do with that; a wing stalls at an ANGLE. The FAA is STILL not requiring training using AOAs -- fifty (50) years afte= r the US Navy put them on every carrier-based aircraft. What was the result of using AOAs on landings by the excellent Navy pilots'= accident rate? It cut landing accidents fifty (50) percent in the very first year! Unintentional stalls cause about a quarter to a third of all general aviati= on fatalities every year. The FAA is a stubborn, slow learner, imho. It is so sad to lose the wonderful pilots and their friends and families, a= nd their beautiful flying machines .. needlessly. Terrence O'Neill 4 yeas a Navy pilot. I designed, built and flight tested and major-modified and flight tested si= x original aircraft, using my own-design of a simple AOA vane... so I could= SEE how close I was flying my wings to their fixed stall AOA. Have published magazine articles ranting on the same need for 50 years ... = but pilots seem to be locked into thinking programmed by their first FAA-d= ictated flight training. On Jan 27, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Kevin Stallard wrote: > Hi Bill, > > If I may respectfully (emphasis on respectfully) disagree. > > It wasn't .the controller that put the plane in a bank and pulled up. W= as the controller confusing? Yep, no doubt. I have to honestly say that= as soon as I heard 'no' and something about extending the downwind, I woul= d have had the inclination of turning left as well. > > I would say that part of the confusion was from the pilot not following d= irections in the first place. If he had been on downwind as the controller= was expecting him too...what would have happened? Who knows... > > In any case, the final analysis is that the pilot did something with his= airplane that caused it to spin. > > Real sad..... > > Kevin > > > ________________________________________ > From: Lancair Mailing List [lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Brad= burry [bbradburry@bellsouth.net] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 8:11 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: LOBO eNews -- January 2014 > > The lesson here is who is going to be at fault when an accident occurs. = The controller cleared the Cirrus to land. He didn=92t clear him number tw= o after the other Cirrus. He also cleared him to land long, so it was perf= ectly logical for the pilot to turn base immediately. Sure, he would proba= bly have lived if he had turned right and landed long and the other Cirrus = had landed on the numbers, but he didn=92t have the other plane in sight an= d didn=92t know where he was so he tried to climb and turn away from the ai= rport and in his panic, did so too aggressively. > > The controller was the total cause of the accident but everything in the = piece turns it back to the pilot. > > Just keep in mind that your pilot license is in the hands of the controll= er, but your LIFE is in YOUR hands! > > Bill > > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html=