X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 07:45:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta11.charter.net ([216.33.127.80] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTP id 6651144 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:48:01 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.80; envelope-from=toms1@chartermi.net Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta11.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20131224014727.QPLX6169.mta11.charter.net@imp09> for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:47:27 -0500 Received: from home128a2c5896 ([24.231.132.147]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id 5DnT1n00G3Ay94Q05DnTVw; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:47:27 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=ZL6PAgHb c=1 sm=1 a=EdWu7vXYYvR4M/uh/rzKtw==:17 a=q_ixq-1tmfwA:10 a=7Vtkk4Wg9cEA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=4ycV2vTZAAAA:8 a=o-Jet5N3NJMA:10 a=21HoqxOMAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=_6GpL_ENAAAA:8 a=j1FSveYkMbztS-AdDmIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=Oxi3NFFUgcgA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=EdWu7vXYYvR4M/uh/rzKtw==:117 X-Original-Message-ID: <4F06890B00B1494889B20E8D1E7BC751@home128a2c5896> From: "Tom & Beth Sullivan" X-Original-To: "LML" Subject: Fw: 1992 "HOW TO KILL YOURSELF IN A HOMEBUILT" X-Original-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:26 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131223-1, 12/23/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean John, As Jeff mentioned, you were at Greenville, came early for the Bob Pastusek presentation, and based on my time with you, clearly are open minded about safety, even when it means more work on the plane when it is so close to flying (the brake tubing discussion). IMHO, you are NOT the candidate that has these kind of issues, because 90% of it is attitude. Follow through with a good training and transition program and you will be fine. Unfortunately, there is a pretty common theme to a lot of the high performance EAB aircraft accidents. Attitude and respect for a faster and more complex airplane, an open mind about your own experience, and willingness to apply some energy towards being properly prepared to fly it, and you will have no problems. You've already got those tributes and they can't be taught! Tom Sullivan ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Cooper" To: Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2013 4:49 PM Subject: Re: 1992 "HOW TO KILL YOURSELF IN A HOMEBUILT" > Peter-- > > With all due respect, since I know you've been flying Lancairs for a long > time, do you think that those of us who haven't flown yet really want to > hear how the Lancair is a dangerous plane and chances are good that we're > going to die on our first flight - or most certainly by the second one? I > understand that your intention in posting that Falco piece was to prod > people into getting some flight time in a similar aircraft before > launching off, but I'm really getting sick of people telling me I'm going > to die soon. I've built the best plane I knew how and fully intend to get > some stick time in a 360 before I fly mine. What I could use right now, > though, is a little moral support. From my 6 hours at the controls of > Clarence Grubbs 69CG, the 235 is a sweet flying plane and not dangerous at > all if one respects the differences from a C-172. But it seems that all I > get more experienced pilots is FUD [Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt]. Several > months ago I attended an EAA meeting at Asheville, NC, and it was the same > with those guys (mostly spam-can RV builders). I went there for some > support, and all I got was FUD. I haven't been back since. > > /rant > > --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com