X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:45:00 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6640514 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:03:24 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.128.42; envelope-from=mwsletten@gmail.com Received: by mail-qe0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b4so3928455qen.15 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:02:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.65.130 with SMTP id j2mr32706270qai.4.1387202568902; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:02:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.125.20 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:02:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:02:48 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LML] Debunking myth of flying fast into headwind From: Mark Sletten X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2c08c5a11a804eda74449 --001a11c2c08c5a11a804eda74449 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Check *Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators*. The figure on page 169 and the accompanying text on page 170 will answer your question. http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/media/00-80T-80.pdf --Mark On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:00 AM, George Wehrung wrote: > Hey guys, > > On long range flights I always fly a Max range profile no matter the wind > direction. Case in point I logged a 7.5 in a king air 200 flying from Lajes > Azores to St Johns Newfoundland today. The winds got up to 122 knots in the > face. But with the internal ferry tank we made it with 800 lbs to spare. > > Anyhow the guy next to me wanted to push it up saying we would spend less > time bucking the wind but I owned the plane today and flew what I perceived > a Max range AOA (no AOA installed) of about 3 degrees nose up and kept > pulling the throttles back to keep her their. This attitude comes from 7 > yrs in king airs and knowing the charts. But I don't have the aero > background to counter his argument. > > Can anyone help me out with research or otherwise? > > I know their is a number of TPS grads and much smarter aviators than I. > > George > > > > Sent from my iPhone > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > --001a11c2c08c5a11a804eda74449 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Check Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators. The figure o= n page 169 and the accompanying text on page 170 will answer your question.=


--Mark

=
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:00 AM, George Wehr= ung <g= w5@me.com> wrote:
Hey guys,

On long range flights I always fly a Max range profile no matter the wind d= irection. Case in point I logged a 7.5 in a king air 200 flying from Lajes = Azores to St Johns Newfoundland today. The winds got up to 122 knots in the= face. But with the internal ferry tank we made it with 800 lbs to spare.
Anyhow the guy next to me wanted to push it up saying we would spend less t= ime bucking the wind but I owned the plane today and flew what I perceived = a Max range AOA (no AOA installed) of about 3 degrees nose up and kept pull= ing the throttles back to keep her their. This attitude comes from 7 yrs in= king airs and knowing the charts. But I don't have the aero background= to counter his argument.

Can anyone help me out with research or otherwise?

I know their is a number of TPS grads and much smarter aviators than I.

George



Sent from my iPhone
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/L= ist.html

--001a11c2c08c5a11a804eda74449--