X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:51:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.220.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6638088 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:11:06 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.45; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id fb1so466851pad.32 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:10:30 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.68.242.163 with SMTP id wr3mr5609773pbc.84.1386965429813; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:10:29 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([76.75.10.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pe3sm6980040pbc.23.2013.12.13.12.10.28 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:10:28 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-50447353-2ED9-4121-9428-769EC1EDB609 X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B554a) From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LML is wonderful a great asset X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 13:10:26 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-50447353-2ED9-4121-9428-769EC1EDB609 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I concur with you Colyn, The LML that came out of the "fast packets" conceived and organized by Jim Fra= nz years ago has continued to be a priceless forum for Lancair community mem= bers to share. Marv taking over this idea and successfully bringing it on l= ine has provided huge benefits for us all.=20 On the other hand this is in no way an official organization that can bind u= s together to act as a group to interface with political, governmental and o= ther groups. LOBO provides that function and we are in a time when that par= ticular function is greatly needed. Hats off to both Marv and to the founders of LOBO. we should be supporting b= oth. John Sent from my iPad > On Dec 13, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Colyn Case wrote: >=20 > Peter, >=20 > It's wonderful you contributed to LML. It is indeed a great asset. I h= adn't read your letter to Marv carefully on the first pass but I think you a= re misinformed if you think that LOBO offers not much. Although I'm no lon= ger on the board of LOBO, and cannot speak officially for LOBO, I can say t= hat being on the board briefly only gave me more appreciation for the founde= rs of LOBO and all they do. Each of them puts in many hundreds of hours pe= r year on your behalf. >=20 > For those that are not aware, here are some of the activities of LOBO: > - created a comprehensive training syllabus and assisted instructors to be= able to deliver that syllabus. > - provided a newsletter with useful articles > - lobbied with the FAA on several initiatives including the current second= pilot initiative > - lobbied with the insurance industry to maintain and improve availability= of coverage to Lancair owners > - maintained relationships with EAA, NTSB > - reached out to new owners to help them get connected with available reso= urces, and answer questions > - organized the annual Oshkosh dinner event > - organized the annual "Landing" gathering > - provided ground school at the "Landing" > - organized the 2014 event in Mobile, AL at Continental headquarters > - answers numerous phone calls and emails you never see > - other stuff I've forgotten that hopefully someone else will add to this t= hread. >=20 > Expenses for doing all of the above have largely been born by the LOBO boa= rd members themselves.=20 >=20 > A couple expenses you should consider carefully: 1) your annual insuranc= e premium 2) the resale value of your aircraft. Both of these would improv= e dramatically if the Lancair safety record were correspondingly improved. = LOBO was founded to improve safety. It needs the best efforts of all its m= embers toward that end, and yes it's going to take some money. However, if= I were to save $3000 in one year on my insurance premium, that would pay my= LOBO dues for 60 years. Seems like a worthwhile investment to me. >=20 > I hope all will consider joining LOBO, giving some extra money, and, more i= mportantly, helping out. There is so much to do. >=20 > for more information, see www.lancairowners.com=20 >=20 > regards, >=20 > Colyn >=20 > On Dec 13, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Colyn Case wrote: >=20 > actually, although Marv doesn't push very hard on this, I think the sugges= ted donation is $50 per year. >=20 > On Dec 13, 2013, at 8:08 AM, PETER WILLIAMS wrote: >=20 > hi there >=20 > i have donated to LML >=20 > this site does not just happen; it happens because of Marv's dedication to= our LML >=20 > i urge you to make a donation; i gave $50.00 but if you gave $5.00 it woul= d help and show appreciation, >=20 > it is a wonderful asset; great people, great info and generally a "go to" s= ource. i have gotten much help that is just not available anywhere else. >=20 > peter >=20 > here is my note to Marv >=20 > Marv >=20 > thank you for your efforts without you there would be no LML >=20 > i have donated $50.00 >=20 > it is a bargain; when one considers what LOBO costs and relatively how lit= tle it offers compared to LML >=20 > yours >=20 > peter williams=20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-50447353-2ED9-4121-9428-769EC1EDB609 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I concur with you Colyn,
The LML that came out of the "fast packets" conceived and organi= zed by Jim Franz years ago has continued to be a priceless forum for Lancair= community members to share.  Marv taking over this idea and successful= ly bringing it on line has provided huge benefits for us all. 

On the other hand this is in no way an official organizatio= n that can bind us together to act as a group to interface with political, g= overnmental and other groups.  LOBO provides that function and we are i= n a time when that particular function is greatly needed.

Hats off to both Marv and to the founders of LOBO.  we should be= supporting both.

John

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 13, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net> wrote:<= br>
Peter,

It's w= onderful you contributed to LML.  It is indeed a great asset.   &n= bsp;I hadn't read your letter to Marv carefully on the first pass but I thin= k you are misinformed if you think that LOBO offers not much.   Althoug= h I'm no longer on the board of LOBO, and cannot speak officially for LOBO, &= nbsp;I can say that being on the board briefly only gave me more appreciatio= n for the founders of LOBO and all they do.   Each of them puts in many= hundreds of hours per year on your behalf.

For tho= se that are not aware, here are some of the activities of LOBO:
- created a comprehensive training syllabus and a= ssisted instructors to be able to deliver that syllabus.
- provide= d a newsletter with useful articles
- lobbied with the FAA on seve= ral initiatives including the current second pilot initiative
- lo= bbied with the insurance industry to maintain and improve availability of co= verage to Lancair owners
- maintained relationships with EAA, NTSB=
- reached out to new owners to help them get connected with avail= able resources, and answer questions
- organized the annual Oshkos= h dinner event
- organized the annual "Landing" gathering
- provided ground school at the "Landing"
- organized the 2014 e= vent in Mobile, AL at Continental headquarters
- answers numerous p= hone calls and emails you never see
- other stuff I've forgotten t= hat hopefully someone else will add to this thread.

Expenses for doing all of the above have largely been born by the L= OBO board members themselves. 

A couple expense= s you should consider carefully:   1) your annual insurance premium 2) t= he resale value of your aircraft.   Both of these would improve dramati= cally if the Lancair safety record were correspondingly improved.   LOB= O was founded to improve safety.  It needs the best efforts of all its m= embers toward that end, and yes it's going to take some money.   Howeve= r, if I were to save $3000 in one year on my insurance premium, that would p= ay my LOBO dues for 60 years.   Seems like a worthwhile investment to m= e.

I hope all will consider joining LOBO, giving so= me extra money, and, more importantly, helping out.  There is so much t= o do.

for more information, see www.lancairowners.com 

regards,

Colyn

On Dec 13, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Colyn Case wrote:

act= ually, although Marv doesn't push very hard on this, I think the suggested d= onation is $50 per year.

On Dec 13, 2013, at 8:08 AM, PETE= R WILLIAMS wrote:

hi there

<= font color=3D"#AC193D" size=3D"4" style=3D"font-size: 16pt; ">i have donated= to LML

<= br>thi= s site does not just happen; it happens because of Marv's dedication to our L= ML
=

i urge y= ou to make a donation; i gave $50.00 but if you gave $5.00 it would help and= show appreciation,

it is a wonderful asset; great people, great info and g= enerally a "go to" source. i have gotten much help that is just not availabl= e anywhere else.

peter

here is my note to Marv

Marv<= br>thank= you for your efforts without you there would be no LML

i have donated $50.00

it is a bargain; whe= n one considers what LOBO costs and relatively how little it offers compared= to LML
<= br>you= rs
=

peter wi= lliams=  


= --Apple-Mail-50447353-2ED9-4121-9428-769EC1EDB609--