X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:54:04 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.220.171] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6636480 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:52:51 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.171; envelope-from=pjdmiller@gmail.com Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ik5so541959vcb.16 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:52:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.186.198 with SMTP id fm6mr4532172vec.16.1386870736837; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:52:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.204.197 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:52:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:52:16 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Ahh, those registration renewal blues From: Paul Miller X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6772089e62fd04ed5a01c6 --047d7b6772089e62fd04ed5a01c6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Maybe it would affect a claim but I think the fault would have to be a material cause of the accident to prevent a legitimate fight with an insurer. I've personally seen a million dollar claim with technical faults on the airworthiness and an expired pilot medical yet claims were processed because those faults had no bearing on the accident and were cured with a minor passage of time. Even the FAA didn't take [major] action. Its good to be up to date but I don't think necessarily a disaster if a "t" isn't crossed or an "i" missing a dot [or your form got lost in the mail or under a pile of renewal forms in OK city]. I could be wrong. > > > On 12 December 2013 12:22, wrote: > >> Ask your insurance company what that means in case of a >> claim............... >> > --047d7b6772089e62fd04ed5a01c6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Maybe it would affect a claim but I think the fault would have to be a ma= terial cause of the accident to prevent a legitimate fight with an insurer.= =A0I've personally seen a million dollar claim with technical faults o= n the airworthiness and an expired pilot medical yet claims were processed = because those faults had no bearing on the accident and were cured with a m= inor passage of time. =A0Even the FAA didn't take [major] action. =A0It= s good to be up to date but I don't think necessarily a disaster if a &= quot;t" isn't crossed or an "i" missing a dot [or your f= orm got lost in the mail or under a pile of renewal forms in OK city]. =A0I= could be wrong.


On 12 December 2013 12:22, <Sky2high@aol.com> wrote:
Ask your insurance=20 company what that means in case of a claim...............
--047d7b6772089e62fd04ed5a01c6--