X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:23:37 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta31.charter.net ([216.33.127.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTP id 6625857 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:59:40 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.82; envelope-from=farnsworth@charter.net Received: from imp10 ([10.20.200.15]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20131204225904.UGWV24708.mta31.charter.net@imp10> for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:59:04 -0500 Received: from OWNERPC ([24.240.22.2]) by imp10 with smtp.charter.net id xaz31m00U02iJEo05az3QD; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:59:03 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=brYUnzmi c=1 sm=1 a=mHRM3OX74vzkVKuopJY6mQ==:17 a=5PMLoRaGl6YA:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=38r2mX3ngagA:10 a=58Ep-bLZAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=69EAbJreAAAA:8 a=GnPUq028JiZY1ZE-yCUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=EfJqPEOeqlMA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=0jL4Ehw9aX8UrxLtvu0A:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=tXsnliwV7b4A:10 a=l1SJu2JVcKgwYXKS:21 a=mHRM3OX74vzkVKuopJY6mQ==:117 From: "Lynn Farnsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: A: LOW COMPRESSION ON ONE BANK X-Original-Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:58:58 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <001501cef144$6a509860$3ef1c920$@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01CEF11A.817D9DA0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQOnsMc1/cVtnf4S0vtcqkDYKrGu/paTJj4A Content-Language: en-us This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CEF11A.817D9DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Might I suggest you join savvyanalysis and have them analyze your engine data. Check the link below. https://www.savvyanalysis.com/home Lynn Farnsworth From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of PETER WILLIAMS Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 3:55 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: A: LOW COMPRESSION ON ONE BANK hi there nothing stood out as substantially different; of course the meter i use is sequential, 1 to 6 as opposed to one bank and then the other but, the issue still is has anyone else had this odd situation where one bank of cylinders has substantially lower compression than the other peter _____ To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:59:06 -0500 From: pjdmiller@gmail.com Subject: [LML] Re: A: LOW COMPRESSION ON ONE BANK I think you would see higher EGTs on those three jugs if that's true. Paul On 2013-12-03, at 16:22, PETER WILLIAMS wrote: P If the reference was off it would cause an incomplete atomization of fuel and cause a lean condition on that bank of cylinders peter _____ To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:52:39 -0500 From: pjdmiller@gmail.com Subject: [LML] Re: LOW COMPRESSION ON ONE BANK I don't see how a leaking upper deck line can cause a lean burn. Someone has to explain that one me (please). Paul On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:28 PM, PETER WILLIAMS wrote: one suggestion was that the UPPER DECK TURBO REFERENCE TUBE was leaking and causing that one bank of cylinders to run lean ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CEF11A.817D9DA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Might I = suggest you join savvyanalysis and have them analyze your engine data. = Check the link below.

https://www.savvyanalysis.com= /home

Lynn = Farnsworth

From:= = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = PETER WILLIAMS
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 3:55 = PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: A: = LOW COMPRESSION ON ONE BANK

hi there

nothing stood out as substantially = different; of course the meter i use is sequential, 1 to 6 as opposed to = one bank and then the other

but, the issue still is has anyone = else had this odd situation where one bank of cylinders has = substantially lower compression than the other

peter

<= div class=3DMsoNormal align=3Dcenter style=3D'text-align:center'>

To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: = Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:59:06 -0500
From: pjdmiller@gmail.com
Subject: = [LML] Re: A: LOW COMPRESSION ON ONE BANK

I = think you would see higher EGTs on those three jugs if that's = true.

Paul

On 2013-12-03, at = 16:22, PETER WILLIAMS <peterpawaviation@hotmail.com= > wrote:

P

If the = reference was off it would cause an incomplete atomization of fuel and = cause a lean condition on that bank of = cylinders

peter
<= div class=3DMsoNormal align=3Dcenter style=3D'text-align:center'>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: = Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:52:39 -0500
From: pjdmiller@gmail.com
Subject: = [LML] Re: LOW COMPRESSION ON ONE BANK
I = don't see how a leaking upper deck line can cause a lean burn. = Someone has to explain that one me = (please).

Paul

=
On = Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:28 PM, PETER WILLIAMS <peterpawaviation@hotmail.com> = wrote:

one suggestion was that the UPPER DECK TURBO = REFERENCE TUBE was leaking and causing that one bank of cylinders = to run lean
=

=

------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CEF11A.817D9DA0--