X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:01:13 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nk11p08mm-asmtp002.mac.com ([17.158.58.247] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTP id 6583725 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:53:00 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=17.158.58.247; envelope-from=gw5@me.com Received: from [192.168.6.50] (ip-64-134-177-46.public.wayport.net [64.134.177.46]) by nk11p08mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MW1008WMT1WEE20@nk11p08mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:52:25 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-11-10_01:2013-11-09,2013-11-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1311100063 References: In-reply-to: MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-46D7A294-24F5-4AE3-AC61-73D8DA1ED118 X-Original-Message-id: <56B83191-5D67-4F2D-A8BE-287FDB4A5BBE@me.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) From: George Wehrung Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Leaking door hinges X-Original-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:52:28 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-46D7A294-24F5-4AE3-AC61-73D8DA1ED118 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thank you Pete. These dams are very nice. =20 Sent from my iPad On Nov 9, 2013, at 13:04, "pete@leapfrogventures.com" wrote: > Photos of hinge dams attached. They should work equally well on ES and IV= standard and P models. > =20 > Pete > =20 > From: William A. Hogarty [mailto:billhogarty@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 7:49 PM > To: Lancair Mailing List > Subject: Re: [LML] Leaking door hinges > =20 > Pete: > =20 > Do you have a picture of your door hinge dam? > =20 >=20 > Thanks, Bill Hogarty > =20 >=20 > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:25 AM, pete@leapfrogventures.com wrote: > George, >=20 > Put a dam across the hinge openings on the side facing the door. The dam b= oth provides a larger surface for the door seal to press against, and elimin= ates water pouring into the cabin when the seal is deflated if there is resi= dual water in the hinge recess. I believe the front dam can be almost full h= eight, but the rear dam needs to be a bit lower due to interference with the= hinge nuts. I replaced the nuts for the hinge that were directly above the= dam with low profile nuts to allow a higher dam. >=20 > Pete >=20 >=20 > =20 > > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l --Apple-Mail-46D7A294-24F5-4AE3-AC61-73D8DA1ED118 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Thank you Pete.  Thes= e dams are very nice.  



Sent from my i= Pad

On Nov 9, 2013, at 13:04, "pete@leapfrogventures.com" <pete@leapfrogventures.com> wrote:

Photos of hinge dams attached.  They should work equally wel= l on ES and IV standard and P models.

 

Pete<= o:p>

 

From: William A. Hogarty [mailto:billhogarty@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 7= :49 PM
To: Lancair Mailing= List
Subject: Re: [LML] L= eaking door hinges

&nb= sp;

Pete:<= /span>

 

Do you have a picture of your door= hinge dam?

&nb= sp;


Thanks,= Bill Hogarty

 

=

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:25 AM, pete@leapfrogventures.com <pete@leapfrogventures.com&g= t; wrote:

George,

P= ut a dam across the hinge openings on the side facing the door.  The da= m both provides a larger surface for the door seal to press against, and eli= minates water pouring into the cabin when the seal is deflated if there is r= esidual water in the hinge recess.  I believe the front dam can be almo= st full height, but the rear dam needs to be a bit lower due to interference= with the hinge nuts.  I replaced the nuts for the hinge that were dire= ctly above the dam with low profile nuts to allow a higher dam.

Pete<= br>

&nb= sp;

<IMG_0861.JPG>
<IMG_0863.JPG>
= --Apple-Mail-46D7A294-24F5-4AE3-AC61-73D8DA1ED118--