X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:44:35 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTP id 6579165 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:44:56 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.101; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net Received: from desktop (adsl-98-85-145-16.mco.bellsouth.net[98.85.145.16]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc01) with SMTP id <20131106184420H0100sr45fe>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 18:44:20 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [98.85.145.16] From: "Bill Bradburry" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: More thoughts on canopy problems X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:44:32 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <853BC8EC51B74008B9CFD6921BED9F61@Desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003C_01CEDAF6.532819B0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac7bHagI5QIY0nw3QTC7Q8+e4TPJtAAAdZPA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01CEDAF6.532819B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Good Luck on that, Bill! In order for Lancair to address this issue, they would first have to acknowledge that there is an issue. That would raise possible liability. You are not likely to hear from Lancair on this. Someone will have to come up with a fix, similar to the Ong Debongers, and share or sell the improvement. Personally, I like the Cozy solution. Bill _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Harrelson Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 1:26 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: More thoughts on canopy problems Hello Fred, Your piece on Legacy canopy opening is a refreshing, well thought out and logical plan of action. My one small disagreement would be who should take the lead on the research and testing that you suggest. LOBO is an all volunteer organization without substantial funds or in-house engineering talent. LOBO has concentrated it's efforts primarily in the training area where it has shown considerable success in reducing the accident rate. I know that LOBO members share your concern for safety I would, however, suggest that Lancair itself may be in a better position to take the lead on this research and I would encourage them to do so. Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 2,150 hrs N6ZQ IV 400 hrs ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01CEDAF6.532819B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Good Luck on that, = Bill!

 

In order for Lancair to address = this issue, they would first have to acknowledge that there is an = issue.  That would raise possible liability.  You are not likely to hear from Lancair = on this.  Someone will have to come up with a fix, similar to the Ong Debongers, and share = or sell the improvement.

 

Personally, I like the Cozy = solution.

 

Bill =  

 

From: = Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Harrelson
Sent: Wednesday, November = 06, 2013 1:26 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: More = thoughts on canopy problems

 

Hello = Fred,

 

Your = piece on Legacy canopy opening is a refreshing, well thought out and logical plan = of action.  My one small disagreement would be who should take the = lead on the research and testing that you suggest. LOBO is an all volunteer organization without substantial funds or in-house engineering talent. = LOBO has concentrated it’s efforts primarily in the training area where it = has shown considerable success in reducing the accident rate. I know that LOBO = members share your concern for safety  I would, however, suggest that = Lancair itself may be in a better position to take the lead on this research and = I would encourage them to do so.

 

 

 

Bill = Harrelson

N5ZQ = 320 2,150 hrs

N6ZQ  IV  400 hrs

 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_003C_01CEDAF6.532819B0--