X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:26:01 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTP id 6579103 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:55:33 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.173.9; envelope-from=n5zq@verizon.net Received: from BillHP ([unknown] [173.72.172.118]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MVU00EPKSFCS230@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:54:49 -0600 (CST) X-Original-Message-id: From: "Bill Harrelson" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: In-reply-to: Subject: Re: [LML] More thoughts on canopy problems X-Original-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:54:49 -0500 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0223_01CEDAEF.60C86DB0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0223_01CEDAEF.60C86DB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Fred, Your piece on Legacy canopy opening is a refreshing, well thought out = and logical plan of action. My one small disagreement would be who = should take the lead on the research and testing that you suggest. LOBO = is an all volunteer organization without substantial funds or in-house = engineering talent. LOBO has concentrated it=E2=80=99s efforts primarily = in the training area where it has shown considerable success in reducing = the accident rate. I know that LOBO members share your concern for = safety I would, however, suggest that Lancair itself may be in a better = position to take the lead on this research and I would encourage them to = do so.=20 Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 2,150 hrs N6ZQ IV 400 hrs ------=_NextPart_000_0223_01CEDAEF.60C86DB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Fred,
 
Your piece on Legacy canopy opening is = a=20 refreshing, well thought out and logical plan of action.  My one = small=20 disagreement would be who should take the lead on the research and = testing that=20 you suggest. LOBO is an all volunteer organization without substantial = funds or=20 in-house engineering talent. LOBO has concentrated it=E2=80=99s efforts = primarily in the=20 training area where it has shown considerable success in reducing the = accident=20 rate. I know that LOBO members share your concern for safety  I = would,=20 however, suggest that Lancair itself may be in a better position to take = the=20 lead on this research and I would encourage them to do so.
 
 
 
Bill Harrelson
N5ZQ 320 2,150 hrs
N6ZQ  IV  400 hrs
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0223_01CEDAEF.60C86DB0--