Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.70; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=C/gJg6V2jszkdAVGvUmkEThUt5P9YJKOwVhz1Sgh+Q2JsbIWgTAqBEQ9wICN3PKn;
  h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: iPad overheated & quit!
From: Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-6457863@logan.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 11:34:42 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B46C1A9B-FF25-4391-ADBC-9841FB9078A1@earthlink.net>
References: <list-6457863@logan.com>
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>

I stand by what I said
My point is simply that Ipads, while wonderful machines (I have on in my =
cockpit), are not built to the same environmental requirements as panel =
mounted gear and the user must be aware of that.  =20


On Sep 6, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Paul Miller wrote:

I lead nobody astray.   But I suspect you might be optimistic about the =
reality of the label of "certified" in day to day use. It's no solution =
to potential failure.  Having electronics subjected to a battery of =
lightning and water tests has no bearing on whether they will or will =
not fail.  They still fail. And they fail without being subjected to =
lightning and water too.   Many Garmins go back to the shop for chips, =
buttons, screens, knobs, memory and other failures.  You can't send one =
back unless you shell out more than three iPads!   How economical is =
that especially when you look at the cost of deriving that model and =
delivering it to the panel?

Almost every high-cost piece of certified equipment I've owned has =
failed or required expensive factory repairs or an expensive warranty to =
backstop potential repairs. There aren't many certified manufacturers =
that give you a warranty much past the burn in period are there?   =
Certified boxes fail and sometimes they aren't even in sunlight when =
they fail.  Cheltons fail, Avidynes fail, Garmins fail.  They all fail.  =
You are making a silly argument suggesting iPad can't be used in =
sunlight.  In the same extreme sunlight, I will get my face, arm and =
lips burned.  It is simply a matter of keeping temps down in a =
reasonable range and out of direct sunlight and that goes for this pilot =
too.   Suggesting an iPad "predictably fails" is no different than any =
other device that exceeds the operating specs. But suggesting they =
aren't for use in the cockpit is really over the top Colyn.   Probably =
hundreds of thousands are in use every day in sunlight and they continue =
to provide the airlines and this pilot much more information at a small =
fraction of the cost of the  "certified" devices.  And, they are better. =
  Having a second in the bag is an affordable and easy backup.  =20

These boxes and iPads both have a place.  One costs an incredible amount =
and can't be updated easily and the other comes off the shelf, is =
inexpensive to own and duplicate and=85is used by the airlines.  Go =
figure.  An uncertified iPad providing guidance in a certified jet.  Who =
would have thought?

If you have stats that show Garmins or any other brand have an =
economically better failure rate than consumer electronics like the iPad =
I'd like to see it. I'm betting if you double up on the iPad for an =
extra $300-$400 your panel device loses in all categories of reliability =
and usefulness.     I could be wrong.

Paul

On 2013-09-06, at 5:55 PM, Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net> wrote:

> No that is not an insane comment.
> A Garmin fails because either you exceeded the fairly stringent =
environmental specs, or there was a chip that was in a bad corner of the =
tolerance matrix, or something else that is statistically fairly low =
probability.
> An ipad fails reliably because it wasn't designed to sit in the sun.
>=20
> Having two garmins definitely lowers the probability of having both =
fail if they are in their intended environment.
>=20
> Having two ipads does nothing if they are not in their intended =
environment.
>=20
> You are leading people astray if you are implying that the fact that =
garmins fail sometimes makes them no better than an ipad subjected to =
the same environment.
>=20
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Paul Miller wrote:
>=20
> Well that's just an insane comment.  Might as well say if I disconnect =
the cooling air from two Garmins they will both overheat.   So what =
Colyn?
>=20
> Paul
> On 2013-09-06, at 8:49 AM, Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net> wrote:
>=20
>> kinda.
>> If you put two ipads on your glare shield in the sun, likely both =
will behave the same.
>=20
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
>=20
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html


--
For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html