Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #65922
From: <Sky2high@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Propeller choice for Lancair 320 and Back Plate failures
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:04:37 -0400 (EDT)
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Nick and Dan,
 
Many ways to skin a cat.
 
Here is nylon bulkhead made on a lathe and bolted to Hartzell 70" CS prop.
 
Grayhawk
 
 
In a message dated 6/18/2013 12:47:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, olsen25@comcast.net writes:

Nick,

 

I’ve got a Lancair 320 with the IO-320-D1B 160hp engine and the Hartzell 70” prop that Lancair and Hartzell approved for this airframe and engine.  I’m very pleased with the performance.  A friend of mine has the same airframe and engine as I do but has the MT 3-blade prop.  When we fly formation at exactly the same power settings, I am pulling away from him at about 3-4kts.  We haven’t tried a side-by-side climb comparison but the 2-blade Hartzell is definitely a bit faster in cruise than the 3-blade Hartzell, just as prop theory would suggest.

 

When I built the plane I was concerned about spinner wobble and stresses, so I created a little donut inside the spinner that fits snugly around the prop hub.  You can see a photo of it here: http://lancair.net/pix/olsen/olsen-construction.  After 720hrs on the airplane I have had no problems with spinner or cracking.

 

Cheers!

 

Dan Olsen

Fort Collins, CO

N320DK, 320 MKII, 720hrs

N630DK, IV-P, 20% complete

 

 

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster