X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:26:19 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6319401 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:24:48 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.223.177; envelope-from=toddlong1@gmail.com Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id aq17so2695937iec.22 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:24:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.80.9 with SMTP id n9mr1322750igx.42.1370967855179; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [10.246.7.75] (51.sub-174-225-131.myvzw.com. [174.225.131.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm3442982igl.3.2013.06.11.09.24.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LIV-P oil temps References: From: Todd Long Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-309BF4E9-5492-4964-A17C-46AC1F2AE267 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:28:02 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-309BF4E9-5492-4964-A17C-46AC1F2AE267 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Do you think at this point it would be a safe assumption since the CHT's run= relatively cool that I am not making too much mechanical friction heat. The= problem is most likely with dissipating normal oil heat? Previous owner never mentioned any problems of excessive oil temps. Typing and grammar errors courtesy of Siri and the iPhone. On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:13, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: > Todd, > =20 > Focus on the air entering and leaving the cooler. Exit blockage or back p= ressure could inhibit cooling. High speed air hitting the entry fins can fo= rm Pressure fronts and inhibit air from entering cooler. > =20 > Grayhawk > =20 > In a message dated 6/11/2013 11:07:45 A.M. Central Daylight Time, toddlong= 1@gmail.com writes: > So my engine has higher than normal oil temps. Haven't experienced summer= since the changes made this winter yet though. Last year they would push th= e 240 mark on climb with 32" and 2500 170 kts at 80 OAT. I've checked the te= mp calibration with both an infrared on the oil pan after flight and dipping= a thermocouple tester in the oil. Both confirmed what the gauge at that tim= e was, about 190 after taxi in. I've replaced the vernatherm and tested it f= or correct opening, checked timing, and winter annual replaced the oil coole= r with an overhauled unit from pacific. This weekend oat was 65 and oil tem= ps were already pushing 200 in climb. Oil cooler box has no leaks using a d= ark hanger and flashlight.My CHTs are ok. #2 being highest at about 360 clim= b and at 250 KTAs at 15000 31" 2500 RPM 16.5GPH 75LOP it is about 310 with t= he rest sub 300. Any ideas? Oil was sampled at annual no significant metal f= ound in analysis.=20 >=20 > Stumped. No ideas from IA or even Continental Engines support either. Las= t year I had to do lower power climb and step to keep it within limits. I bo= ught the plane last July with about 650 TT. Only about 20 hrs then since ove= rhaul. By John Jewel. He had no ideas beyond what I had done either. Compres= sions and Borescope looked good. No glazing, no oil blowby that could be det= ected. And no consumption problems.=20 >=20 > Sent from my iPad > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l --Apple-Mail-309BF4E9-5492-4964-A17C-46AC1F2AE267 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Do you think at this point it would be a safe assumption since the CHT's run relatively cool that I am not making too much mechanical friction heat. The problem is most likely with dissipating normal oil heat?
Previous owner never mentioned any problems of excessive oil temps.

Typing and grammar errors courtesy of Siri and the iPhone.

On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:13, Sky2high@aol.com wrote:

Todd,
 
Focus on the air entering and leaving the cooler.  Exit blockage or back pressure could inhibit cooling.  High speed air hitting the entry fins can form Pressure fronts and inhibit air from entering cooler.
 
Grayhawk
 
In a message dated 6/11/2013 11:07:45 A.M. Central Daylight Time, toddlong1@gmail.com writes:
So my engine has higher than normal oil temps.  Haven't experienced summer since the changes made this winter yet though. Last year they would push the 240 mark on climb with 32" and 2500 170 kts at 80 OAT. I've checked the temp calibration with both an infrared on the oil pan after flight and dipping a thermocouple tester in the oil. Both confirmed what the gauge at that time was, about 190 after taxi in.  I've replaced the vernatherm and tested it for correct opening, checked timing, and winter annual replaced the oil cooler with an overhauled unit from pacific.  This weekend oat was 65 and oil temps were already pushing 200 in climb.  Oil cooler box has no leaks using a dark hanger and flashlight.My CHTs are ok. #2 being highest at about 360 climb and at 250 KTAs at 15000 31" 2500 RPM 16.5GPH 75LOP it is about 310 with the rest sub 300. Any ideas? Oil was sampled at annual no significant metal found in analysis.

Stumped. No ideas from IA or even Continental Engines support either.  Last year I had to do lower power climb and step to keep it within limits. I bought the plane last July with about 650 TT. Only about 20 hrs then since overhaul. By John Jewel. He had no ideas beyond what I had done either. Compressions and Borescope looked good. No glazing, no oil blowby that could be detected. And no consumption problems.

Sent from my iPad
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
--Apple-Mail-309BF4E9-5492-4964-A17C-46AC1F2AE267--