Angier,
Be very careful here. The "chaptergram" by Earl Lawrence is not
correct. Please rely on the specific items pertaining to changes and
maintenance as detailed in your airworthy certificate. Be aware that
such certificates are not the same today as those issued in1996.
The second FAA item also suffers from old age.
Anyone can "maintain" or make modifications to an experimental aircraft and
as such should be logged. The pilot is responsible for the safety of each
flight. But, an annual condition inspection must be performed by the
repairman certified for the specific plane (the builder may become such a
repairman for the airplane he built) or an A&P (need not be an AI), thus the
plane is yearly certified as in a condition safe for flight after
maintenance done as outlined in an appendix of part 43.
Seek guidance from the aircraft's airworthy certificate.
To read these is to become confused. Instead, read the latest FAA
circular pertaining to experimental amateur-built aircraft.
Scott Krueger
PS, see the attached letter I sought from the FAA after an Insurance
company refused to pay/defend claims caused from a crash by a builder that
altered and then restored his aircraft's fuel system before the
crash.
In a message dated 4/12/2013 9:16:11 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET writes:
I
stumbled across these links recently and thought they might be of interest
here.
http://www.wanttaja.com/avlinks/maint.htm
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/field_offices/fsdo/orl/local_more/media/ppt/exper-ia.ppt
Angier
Ames
N4ZQ
--
For archives and unsub
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html