X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:53:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-gh0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.4) with ESMTPS id 6191410 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:44:07 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.169; envelope-from=toddlong1@gmail.com Received: by mail-gh0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r18so1174489ghr.28 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:43:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.207.198 with SMTP id n46mr16623166yho.153.1365547411412; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:43:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([187.185.220.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o64sm45908062yhd.16.2013.04.09.15.43.30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [LML] Slope of Hangar Apron References: From: Todd Long Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-BE30B9D4-E724-44A6-BD08-BB60C00D27BD X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <417D9982-075C-4BEB-91CD-D63CBE4188B7@gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:44:54 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-BE30B9D4-E724-44A6-BD08-BB60C00D27BD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Where in Minnesota and what Lancair do you have? Sent from my iPad On Apr 9, 2013, at 9:47, "Michael D Smith" wrote: > Listers, > =20 > This may seem like a random question, but potentially I am building a hang= ar on a lot that has a water drainage issue with taxiway runoff. The buildi= ng needs to be elevated, not a big deal, but that slopes the apron leading t= o the taxiway. Does anyone know if there=92s a code value for the slope, i.= e. a 1% grade, or some other rule of thumb as to what may constitute too ste= ep of a grade, i.e., so steep that pushing the plane up would be too much or= so steep the plane would roll uncontrollable down if one is moving it by ha= nd? Any insights would be appreciated. > =20 > Michael Smith --Apple-Mail-BE30B9D4-E724-44A6-BD08-BB60C00D27BD Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Where in Minnesota and what Lancair do= you have?

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 9, 2013, at 9:47, "= Michael D Smith" <mdpilot982@gmai= l.com> wrote:

=

Listers,

 

This may seem like a random question, but potentially I a= m building a hangar on a lot that has a water drainage issue with taxiway runoff.  The building needs to be elevated, not a big deal, but that sl= opes the apron leading to the taxiway.  Does anyone know if there=E2=80=99s a co= de value for the slope, i.e. a 1% grade, or some other rule of thumb as to what may constitute too steep of a grade, i.e., so steep that pushing the plane up wo= uld be too much or so steep the plane would roll uncontrollable down if one is moving it by hand?  Any insights would be appreciated.

 

Michael Smith

= --Apple-Mail-BE30B9D4-E724-44A6-BD08-BB60C00D27BD--