Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #64334
From: Paul Miller <pjdmiller@gmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Accident rate for LOBO members vs non-members
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:45:39 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Maybe I missed something.  Who is asking/suggesting a SFAR for Experimental on this list?  What I'm reading/interpreting is that if [LOBO] efforts can be organized to reduce the accident rate then the chances for some action like an SFAR would probably decline (plus the other benefits of fewer accidents). Sort of like "planning farther forward" is my take.

Paul
Legacy (easy-to-fly version)

On 2013-01-31, at 10:08 AM, "Lynn Farnsworth" <farnsworth@charter.net> wrote:

some on the LML who seem to feel that the way to
solve the problems is to invite the "friendly FAA" …

I am very uncomfortable with the concept of an SFAR for experimental...
- Kyrilian

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster