X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:08:37 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta21.charter.net ([216.33.127.81] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 6038562 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:24:15 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.81; envelope-from=farnsworth@charter.net Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta21.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20130131142340.CLXZ10448.mta21.charter.net@imp09> for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:23:40 -0500 Received: from OWNERPC ([24.240.23.88]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id uePf1k00d1u2RW005ePfJr; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:23:40 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Cp/n6QED c=1 sm=1 a=K+sFKCfdL2IjB7v8SKVovw==:17 a=s5_UsKeWhR4A:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=PsZ8-kt-5osA:10 a=s9F4DlaalP88_du6k7YA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=K+sFKCfdL2IjB7v8SKVovw==:117 From: "Lynn Farnsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Accident rate for LOBO members vs non-members X-Original-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:23:36 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <079301cdffbe$8ef28520$acd78f60$@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQFU2h1kWMXHjBV3XHC4GTEdqSZzgplVwwwQ Content-Language: en-us I too am not impressed with some on the LML who seem to feel that the way to solve the problems is to invite the "friendly FAA" in to make more rules to save everyone from themselves. What a crock! As for those who have expressed the idea that a Legacy is difficult to fly, I have just the opposite point of view. I think the Legacy is easy to fly; it is faster than a lot of aircraft and thusly you have to project your planning farther forward of the aircraft. If I have not made myself completely clear; keep your flipping hands off my freedom to fly the way it presently exists. However, be my guest to impose any rule you want on what you require of yourself as to how you fly or don't fly your personal aircraft! Lynn Farnsworth Super Legacy TSIO-550 Powered MMO .6 Mach Race #44 I think that the homebuilt fraternity and the rules that allow it are special, and should be preserved I am very uncomfortable with the concept of an SFAR for experimental aircraft. As you said, the primary benefit of the amateur built arena is the freedom that results because of minimal regulation. Inviting the FAA to insert more regulation may very well be a cure that kills the patient. I am an otherwise happy LOBO member, but this is one initiative that I strongly oppose. - Kyrilian L2K-236 Hoping to make it to Greenville this fall