Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #64319
From: Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Accident rate for LOBO members vs non-members
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:47:10 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

Why is flight training by a HIPAT instructor so much more expensive than flight training by other instructors?  I think that is a larger factor in the “reluctance by some” to get training in Lancairs than any other reason with the possible exception of availability of an HIPAT instructor.

 

Bill B

 


From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Todd Long
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:21 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Accident rate for LOBO members vs non-members

 

The reluctance by some to regular and ongoing training baffles me. When I picked up my "preflown" IV-P I met a lobo instructor there and did training on the way home. I spent 3 days with him and still feel I have a lot to learn. Could I have picked it up and made it home safely? Absolutely. Did I do the training just for insurance reasons? No. Im sure some will disagree, but here it is: if you feel you are too good and safe already to not need training and practice in this aircraft you have no business flying it with passengers. Check the ego at the hanger door. This airplane needs to be flown by a well trained pilot in a professional manner. I applauded Jeff for his efforts to start an organization dedicated to bettering the safety record of lancairs. I think the lancairs can be flown by regular private pilots with appropriate training and an appropriate attitude. Training is not a substitute for experience. But without some training you might not live long enough to get the experience. Just because the airplane might be capable of something doesn't mean the pilot is. 

 

BTW, I spend almost 15 days a year in recurrent simulator training. And still think I can benefit from one on one with a lancair instructor every year

 

Todd Long

Capt CE-750 (citation X)

NetJets


Sent from my iPad


On Jan 30, 2013, at 19:41, vtailjeff@aol.com wrote:

Scott,

 

What Lancair model do you fly?

 

Jeff

Sent from my iPad


On Jan 30, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Scott E Keighan <scottekeighan@sympatico.ca> wrote:

George,
I respect your position with respect to the LOBO but I disagree that because I choose not to be a member I am not
making a commitment to being a better pilot. I am a member of the LML amount numerous other organizations. You have no idea whom I am, what I have done or what I am doing. I will not get into it here on this forum. Lets just say that I am a professional within the aviation industry ongoing for over 30 years. I have given numerous talks to various organizations with respect to my profession and interests.

I will not get into whom I think is a safer or a better pilot or how to achieve that goal.  Although I do have my own thoughts on that.

Scott Keighan

P.S. I fly IFR and VFR as required in both airplanes and helicopters. I also do not have any issues getting insurance or training.


To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:30:58 -0500
From: gw5@me.com
Subject: [LML] Re: Accident rate for LOBO members vs non-members

Scott,

 

It should be obvious that LOBO is not going to get rich off of $40/yr per member. This rate should be viewed as a great rate for a couple of reasons:

 

1. The tremendous amount of information with regard to building the various models of Lancairs, the depth of aviation experience in aerodynamics and pilotage of our Lancairs, and the knowledge base of regulations from those who served in regulatory bodies. 

 

2. All of the above plus the commitment of each of us to become better pilots whether through proficiency training or increasing our ratings/knowledge base enables such a body as LOBO to better represent us as whole whether its for insurance rates or for potential FAA governance. 

 

In my opinion, for the cost of 7 gallons or a half hour of flying per year we are getting a great deal. 

 

In sum; you won't be a better pilot because you joined LOBO but because you made a comittment to be a better pilot by learning from others and taking the step to go beyond the status quo. 

 

I can't tell you how many pilots that I have talked to that just go bombing through MOAs and other high density traffic areas squawking 1200 because they can without talking to anyone. Just because you can doesn't mean it's smarter. 

 

It's fun to fly VFR but having the ability and knowledge to fly IFR in your back pocket benefits you and everyone in your plane and the airspace around you. 

 

George

 

 

 

 

 



Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:27, marv@lancair.net wrote:


Posted for Scott E Keighan <scottekeighan@sympatico.ca>:

So let me get this right. If I pay you $40 to join the LOBO I will be a
better pilot then a non-LOBO member, cool.
How exactly does that work?
Other then someone getting $40 richer, I don't see it. Is this like a pyramid
scam?

Don't insult non members and get a life. As a matter of fact. If the LOBO is
so great, why are you even on the LML?
I think the LOBO members should go to their own blog. I am sure they have
one.
Scott keighan
905 262 5997

[Whoa... lighten up.  Since the LML had been operating successfully for a number of years prior to the founding of LOBO and the LML would likely already be in touch with most folks who would be interested in joining and participating in LOBO, an agreement was forged which allowed LOBO to use the LML as its communications arm.  It was a logical decision which would benefit both entities.  Both organizations exist for the benefit of the Lancair community, especially where safety is involved.  As for cost... if $40/year is too much to pay to an organization dedicated to your safety and actively working to help getting  the Lancair fleet insured at better rates then don't join. Also, don't participate in their discussions or learn anything from their shared knowledge... at least that way you'll get what you paid for. But don't throw stones at folks who are trying to help... that doesn't get us anywhere.  <marv>    ]

 



From: colyncase@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:31:05 -0500
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Accident rate for LOBO members vs non-members

Dico,
That's a good point.   That's one reason we would like to get as many Lancair
pilots on the LML and into LOBO as possible.    It's largely a word of mouth
process to get let people know about these two resources.  Getting the word
out to everyone is one of the "things we can do as a community" to improve the
situation.  
LOBO membership is $40 at www.lancairowners.com.
(Marv would love contributions to keep the LML site going too!)
Colyn
On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Dico Reijers wrote:If the accident rate for
Lancairs is 500x that of commercial aviation... do we have a break down of
what the rate is of LOBO members vs. Non-members.  I would hope that by just
being a LOBO member and reading/learning from this group that the accident
rate for us is more in line with the 300x experimental or even better than
that.

Have we gone through the Lancair accidents to see if the PIC was a LOBO
member.  It would be interesting.
-DIco

--
Regards,

Dico Reijers

InternetWorks Ltd.

300 University Avenue
Charlottetown
PE, C1A 4M4

902-892-4671 (T)
888-368-9484 (F)

www.internetworks.ca
www.apartmentspei.com


     

 

--
 
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster