X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:10:42 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 6033681 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:31:16 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=71.74.56.122; envelope-from=kkellner1@new.rr.com X-Original-Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=QcjkT7nv c=1 sm=0 a=obLwkm3ISv3u5N1fLH+lKQ==:17 a=Iy1csxky15oA:10 a=3ECXb6GesPAA:10 a=05ChyHeVI94A:10 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=tNDxKCid19EA:10 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=TcOTK9K9wz0t4YEp5WEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=o1OHuDzbAAAA:8 a=cZb7wqtze5yzXhYOgFEA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=ILCZio5HsAgA:10 a=Q3DC-Y6_fpur65FE:21 a=obLwkm3ISv3u5N1fLH+lKQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 70.92.78.168 Received: from [70.92.78.168] ([70.92.78.168:1818] helo=D4SSJS91) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id D1/53-06396-1FFD6015; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:30:41 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <669834B675884D07AC29E1FEB449EC65@D4SSJS91> From: "Ken" X-Original-To: , "Charles Brown" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 4P AUGERING IN X-Original-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:30:38 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_026F_01CDFD64.0AD2B370" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_026F_01CDFD64.0AD2B370 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Charles, I am not in favor of the FAA forcing us to take action. However, I fear = that if we don't, they will. Ken Kellner IVP 14LK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Charles Brown=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 4P AUGERING IN Do you *really* want the FAA to step into the Experimental Amateur = Built world with what's essentially a type rating requirement? This is = a first step towards setting performance and handling characteristic = limits on homebuilts, and then things like the Evo and IVP disappear and = you're left with TBM-700 and Piper Meridian. Grab your wallet. On Jan 27, 2013, at 5:59 AM, peter williams wrote: i wish that the FAA would impose something like they did to the MU2 = pilots; it would keep us all safer. ------=_NextPart_000_026F_01CDFD64.0AD2B370 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Charles,
 
I am not in favor of the FAA forcing us to take action.  = However, I=20 fear that if we don't, they will.
 
Ken Kellner
IVP  14LK
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Charles=20 Brown
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 = 12:30=20 PM
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 4P = AUGERING=20 IN

Do you *really* want the FAA to step into the Experimental = Amateur Built=20 world with what's essentially a type rating requirement?  This is = a first=20 step towards setting performance and handling characteristic limits on = homebuilts, and then things like the Evo and IVP disappear and you're = left=20 with TBM-700 and Piper Meridian.  Grab your wallet.


On Jan 27, 2013, at 5:59 AM, peter williams wrote:

i = wish that the=20 FAA would impose something like they did to the MU2 = pilots; it=20 would keep us all=20 = safer.

------=_NextPart_000_026F_01CDFD64.0AD2B370--