Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:46:29 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-6033560@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.78.17.176; envelope-from=johnwcox@pacificnw.com
Subject: Re: [LML] Hartzell Prop Efficiency
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: "John Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
thread-topic: [LML] Hartzell Prop Efficiency
thread-index: Ac39fqln3WbDH8NpTPGtBuVOPdHV4Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0

I would be most interested to read it and will not compromise your =
desire.=0A=
=0A=
John Cox=0A=
=0A=
Charles Brown <browncc1@verizon.net> wrote:=0A=
=0A=
I have had two offline requests for the data and considered posting it =
to the web site.  However ... even though there were no restrictions =
when it was provided to me, I think it's only fair to Hartzell to keep =
it off this public web site.  Accordingly, I am providing it directly to =
those who request it and only asking that they agree not to deliver it =
to a competitor, and not to publish it without Hartzell's permission.

Charley=20
--
For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html