Return-Path: Received: from poptop.llnl.gov ([128.115.41.70]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:56:10 -0400 Received: from [128.115.38.45] (heliotrope.llnl.gov [128.115.38.45]) by poptop.llnl.gov (8.8.8/LLNL-3.0.2/pop.llnl.gov-5.1) with ESMTP id IAA10481 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 08:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 08:00:12 -0700 To: "Lancair List" From: John Poco Subject: Noble gases X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Since I make a living doing things with chemicals I will shed some light on the gas issue. In reality if you wanted a more optimum fill gas argon would actually be a better choice from the standpoint of heat transfer (its heat transfer is at least twice that of nitrogen or air)-hence its use in some of the newer double pane windows...Unfortunately argon and its cousins are monatomic (one atom) and their diffusion through membranes (tires, o-rings, etc.) is fairly rapid, relatively speaking. Its also a little more expensive and harder to find. Nitrogen is of course diatomic and a larger molecule that behaves mostly like air except without the oxidative qualities-causes other materials to decay faster..I hope this has put to rest the gas issue... [Not to be a nit-picker, but the heat transfer capability of Ar is 1/2 that of Nitrogen... at least that's what 20 years in the insulated glass business has taught me. I imagine that was a typo . However... "I hope this has put to rest the gas issue..." Amen, brother. ] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>