X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:41:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.146] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 6031930 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:27:22 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.146; envelope-from=peterpaw@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.10]) by imr-da04.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id B5AB01C000075 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:26:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-mma004b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mma004.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.191.141]) by mtaomg-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 7ECE6E000081 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:26:48 -0500 (EST) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 4P AUGERING IN In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter williams X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CFCADB6291FD1C_1708_84A18_webmail-m001.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37309-STANDARD Received: from 69.204.230.119 by webmail-m001.sysops.aol.com (64.12.101.83) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:26:48 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CFCADB6286163C-1708-27A61@webmail-m001.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [69.204.230.119] X-Original-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:26:48 -0500 (EST) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:396889120:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d290a51057f7836d2 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CFCADB6291FD1C_1708_84A18_webmail-m001.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" hi there No you are correct, no need for more FAA. but the real police, anyway, are the insurance companies and they can do it= for their own selfish interests. peter =20 =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Charles Brown To: lml Sent: Sun, Jan 27, 2013 1:30 pm Subject: [LML] Re: 4P AUGERING IN Do you *really* want the FAA to step into the Experimental Amateur Built wo= rld with what's essentially a type rating requirement? This is a first ste= p towards setting performance and handling characteristic limits on homebui= lts, and then things like the Evo and IVP disappear and you're left with TB= M-700 and Piper Meridian. Grab your wallet. On Jan 27, 2013, at 5:59 AM, peter williams wrote: i wish that the FAA would impose something like they did to the MU2 pilots;= it would keep us all safer. =20 ----------MB_8CFCADB6291FD1C_1708_84A18_webmail-m001.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" hi there

No you are correct, no need for more FAA.
but the real police, anyway, are the insurance companies and they can do it for their own selfis= h interests.

peter




-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Brown <browncc1@verizon.net>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sun, Jan 27, 2013 1:30 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: 4P AUGERING IN

Do you *really* want the FAA to step into the Experimental Amateur Bui= lt world with what's essentially a type rating requirement?  This is a= first step towards setting performance and handling characteristic limits = on homebuilts, and then things like the Evo and IVP disappear and you're le= ft with TBM-700 and Piper Meridian.  Grab your wallet.


On Jan 27, 2013, at 5:59 AM, peter williams wrote:


i wish that the FAA would impose something like t= hey did to the MU2 pilots; it would keep us all safer.


----------MB_8CFCADB6291FD1C_1708_84A18_webmail-m001.sysops.aol.com--