X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:30:22 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm16.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.94.237.217] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6031413 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 07:33:04 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.237.217; envelope-from=browncc1@verizon.net Received: from [66.94.237.195] by nm16.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jan 2013 12:32:29 -0000 Received: from [98.138.85.45] by tm6.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jan 2013 12:32:29 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp102.vzn.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jan 2013 12:32:29 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 107171.3991.bm@smtp102.vzn.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: sWUsYU0VM1l_tKVplJGF_XoCgBwsVXV8K97FgTOa34HRiDd YWFic68olQT1gYjHZFQ0P01kCyU1xqgeU3GmntzD0y.4WUIfnYYpT8WaWh1d DQEbfYZIo0On0uEQOHqTdfrwy3Z7j6k56xTnJQ97neRcgdf5DX.pCmCWCiJa 9LUw9Ii3alABl28zi2Mux6EB_6iXDjZnQm0_.fom9mYrcDD.F6pIBR2rW90H BfIcF0o2qN9zv4eLcz6VzYe1srxO8GhYpVB.RsoCcKAPJ3ljCJgS9a_48X_l nWiqvBu8zWU3_70kYrCLCCvRiQZcK0tHD0yobbQd_yq40_azMjhSoue8SL64 6rkNqhs6C7Eh8kgf0BCAuQV19aoIe3ZOVUg9MlCWJecXCWh46Qiq0bjW.Ox3 JnvRVinP2rs.xxjB1RK2wuS_XleVoyUioPOHpEuv9cNs7UnzAAxLnP0OZv3q 7l4HxXeB8DCLpw94IZRbsaxwD_78- X-Yahoo-SMTP: F49l9g6swBC0R9n8vJIbm7Tf3P8Xlmia8rHIwTlO__Ml Received: from chass-imac-2.home (browncc1@72.64.105.53 with plain) by smtp102.vzn.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jan 2013 12:32:28 +0000 UTC From: Charles Brown Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-8-878142137 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 4P AUGERING IN X-Original-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:32:27 -0600 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: <60232222-95D1-40A9-B845-C54B9212F265@verizon.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) --Apple-Mail-8-878142137 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Do you *really* want the FAA to step into the Experimental Amateur Built = world with what's essentially a type rating requirement? This is a = first step towards setting performance and handling characteristic = limits on homebuilts, and then things like the Evo and IVP disappear and = you're left with TBM-700 and Piper Meridian. Grab your wallet. On Jan 27, 2013, at 5:59 AM, peter williams wrote: i wish that the FAA would impose something like they did to the MU2 = pilots; it would keep us all safer. --Apple-Mail-8-878142137 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Do you *really* want the FAA to step into the Experimental Amateur Built world with what's essentially a type rating requirement?  This is a first step towards setting performance and handling characteristic limits on homebuilts, and then things like the Evo and IVP disappear and you're left with TBM-700 and Piper Meridian.  Grab your wallet.


On Jan 27, 2013, at 5:59 AM, peter williams wrote:


i wish that the FAA would impose something like they did to the MU2 pilots; it would keep us all safer.


--Apple-Mail-8-878142137--