X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [70.118.110.50] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 6.0) with HTTP id 5969643 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:41:47 -0500 From: Subject: Re: [LML] Winglets for Hans To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v6.0 Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:41:47 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <41361035E6613244A377D5AC3BF5EFDD4A828A69@CH1PRD0710MB367.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> References: <41361035E6613244A377D5AC3BF5EFDD4A828A69@CH1PRD0710MB367.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Posted for Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek@htii.com>:

Hans wrote:

Hi all ,
I am thinking of adding winglets on Lancair 4 , I will not be going above 12k
feet due to oxygen , will I gain any cruising speed at 12000ft or bellow ?
Looking forward to your suggestions,

Hans,
The IV/IV-P will definitely slow down with the addition of winglets. I have
them on my IV-P (N437RP) and I believe they improve the landing
characteristics-specifically stability-a bit; and the Australians required
them for high altitude (FL 200 and above?) cruise stability. The down-side is
that they add drag to a very efficient, low-drag wing while in cruise mode,
slowing the airplane down. At least one of our Lancair builders has done some
"side by side" flight testing with/without winglets and posted this
information to the LML in past years, My own experience with was from some
side-by-side flying with Bob Wolstenholme early in my flight test period.
...not scientific at all, but his airplane, without winglets and a 3-blade
prop (I have and MT 4-blade) was definitely faster (5-10 KIAS) in cruise with
similar engine power settings... K
I asked my wife about deleting them and building some regular tips...she says
NO...they are sexy!  So they will stay, and I will follow the faster airplanes
a bit in trail...  J
My two cents...
Bob