X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 02:17:20 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c2) with ESMTPS id 5844493 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:18:12 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.223.180; envelope-from=donkarich@gmail.com Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id e10so4093689iej.25 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:17:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.119.133 with SMTP id b5mr21247166icr.56.1351307857830; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.100.201 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.100.201 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:17:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:17:37 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: New Legacy Project From: Don Karich X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba5bc233d923f004cd01e057 --90e6ba5bc233d923f004cd01e057 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Kevin, I can only speak for my experience. My goal was to keep it as light as possible and as forward CG as possible thereby giving me the greatest payload as possible without leaving the envelope. To do so i have two b+c batterys(dual electrical systems) on the firewall(eliminates a lot of heavy wire), no floorboards. I have empty wt under 1500 and several inches forward of leading edge. With 2 people, Minimal fuel and flight bag, CG is on forward limit. Plane Flys very well, almost impossible to overload .only downside i can find is that i believe that I'm told if CG is further aft speed is greater. On Oct 26, 2012 7:47 PM, "Kevin Stallard" wrote: > Weight is everything. Especially at our high altitude on hot summer days. > I recommend you weigh your options by giving considerable weight to your > weight. :) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of > James Seilbach > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:48 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] New Legacy Project > > Hello, > > I am starting a new Legacy Project in January with 2 weeks of builder > assistance in Oregon. I will be building it a KFNL in Colorado. I am > trying to decide which options to build into my project and have been > exhaustively scouring the internet looking for ideas/suggestions. I have > learned a lot from searching through the archives of this list, Thank you! > > One option I am considering is AC, and it looks like N33RH had a pretty > interesting AC installation with a duct on the bottom of the aircraft. I > haven't been able to find out where it came from. I believe the aircraft > was built by Rich Henning, and I found a website with some information on > it (http://www.lancairlegacy.com/RHGroup.html), but the contact info, > email and phone number, are out of date. I spoke with Lancair and they do > not have any updated contact information for him either. Does anyone have > current contact information for Rich, possibly he is still subscribed to > this list? > > Thanks in advance! > > James Seilbach > james@seilbach.com > 970-691-9305 > > > > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > --90e6ba5bc233d923f004cd01e057 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Kevin, I can only speak for my experience. My goal was to keep it as lig= ht as possible and as forward CG as possible thereby giving me the greatest= payload as possible without leaving the envelope. To do so i have two b+c = batterys(dual electrical systems) on the firewall(eliminates a lot of heavy= wire), no floorboards. I have empty wt under 15= 00 and several inches forward of leading edge. With 2 people, Minimal f= uel and flight bag, CG is on forward limit. Plane Flys very well, almost im= possible to overload .only downside i can find is that i believe that I'= ;m told if CG is further aft speed is greater.

On Oct 26, 2012 7:47 PM, "Kevin Stallard&qu= ot; <kevin@arilab= s.net> wrote:
Weight is everything. =A0Especially at our high altitude on hot summer days= . =A0I recommend you weigh your options by giving considerable weight to yo= ur weight. :)


-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of James Seilbach Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:48 AM
To: lml@lancairo= nline.net
Subject: [LML] New Legacy Project

Hello,

I am starting a new Legacy Project in January with 2 weeks of builder assis= tance in Oregon. =A0 I will be building it a KFNL in Colorado. =A0I am tryi= ng to decide which options to build into my project and have been exhaustiv= ely scouring the internet looking for ideas/suggestions. =A0 I have learned= a lot from searching through the archives of this list, Thank you!

One option I am considering is AC, and it looks like N33RH had a pretty int= eresting AC installation with a duct on the bottom of the aircraft. =A0 I h= aven't been able to find out where it came from. =A0 I believe the airc= raft was built by Rich Henning, and I found a website with some information= on it (http://www.lancairlegacy.com/RHGroup.html), but the contact info, = email and phone number, are out of date. =A0 I spoke with Lancair and they = do not have any updated contact information for him either. =A0Does anyone = have current contact information for Rich, possibly he is still subscribed = to this list?

Thanks in advance!

James Seilbach
james@seilbach.com<= /a>
970-6= 91-9305



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/L= ist.html

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/L= ist.html
--90e6ba5bc233d923f004cd01e057--